Monthly Archives: October 2012

THE MASTER Review: The Master and His Dog

If you’re looking for a time travel theme in an unexpected place, you’ll find some of that in “The Master.” It’s not going to bring in everyone who went to see “Looper,”  the artful crowd pleaser, but it would surprise that demographic. While a serious film dealing with a heavy subject, “The Master” is anything but dull. This film is written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, who is known for riveting films like, “There Will Be Blood.”  At its core, it is a story about trying to find one’s way in the world and about those who prey on lost souls.

Joaquin Phoenix plays the role of the lost soul, Freddie. Phillip Seymour Hoffman plays the role of Lancaster Dodd, the leader of a cult, who takes on Freddie has his special project. It doesn’t take much observation to conclude that Freddie has little to offer and is going to be very high maintenance once he’s found as a stowaway aboard a vessel that Dodd is currently using. Freddie remains a pretty messed up case a few years out of his time in the Navy during World War II. He has a libido and a thirst for alcohol that are both insatiable and have kept him a train wreck. He isn’t even trying to charm his way into Dodd’s life but, despite it all, Dodd finds him amusing and spots his talent, his ability to concoct highly intoxicating drinks. Dodd doesn’t press Freddie to reveal his ingredients, which include paint thinner. Freddie, in turn, accepts Dodd at face value.

Both Dodd and Freddie are con men and liars. Freddie, to his credit, is more honest about it. His criminality is written on his face and is primitive and, maybe even pure. Dodd’s variety of crime is sophisticated up to a point. It is when someone carefully listens to what Dodd is saying that his limitations are revealed. His own son confides in Freddie that Dodd is a fraud. His lectures and workshops on self-improvement are made up as he goes along, like his assertions that cancer can be cured by time travel. It’s pretty loopy stuff that even Freddie realizes is outrageous.

Freddie proves to be Dodd’s perfect pet, his lap dog. He is welcome to stay for as long as he wants, just as long as he doesn’t, in a manner of speaking, shit in the house. Freddie tries to go one better and acts as Dodd’s fiercely loyal guard dog which is not exactly in anyone’s best interest. This is all fascinating stuff. Dodd appears to hold a privileged status while attempting to stay one step ahead of the law. Freddie appears to be a buffoon while he also seems to have a Rasputin-like power over Dodd and his cult.

It is said time and again that movies are not novels or plays and a film does well not to aspire to the texture and substance of a book. That is, unless a film makes it work. You will see more finely nuanced acting, more extended passages of solid storytelling in “The Master” than you typically see in films, or at least in a major motion picture and it works. While it is easy for some to say that they’d edit a half hour out of this or that movie that is currently touted as excellent, it is another thing for that same smart aleck to say what it is that needs to be cut. With a running time of two and a half hours, “The Master” is one of those films that is vulnerable to those type of snarky remarks. What remains, long after the reviews and the Oscars, will be intriguing entertainment like, “The Master.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Entertainment, Movie Reviews

LOOPER Review: Art House Action Movie

“Looper” is an elegant action movie with Emily Blunt stealing the show in a cast of seasoned scene stealers. It’s one of those movies that attracts a wide audience while, at the same time, by its very nature, you’d think would appeal only to an art house crowd. This film is written and directed by Rian Johnson who is known for artful work like, “The Brothers Bloom.” What is the magic formula that works here? Casting plays a big role, of course. From the get go you have three favorites: Bruce Willis, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Emily Blunt. And then you have the time travel theme that, like a moth to flame, despite the fact it promises no guarantees of true entertainment value, we seem to not get enough of.

Why this time travel flick and not another? There’s the twist: This one is about loopers! And this one pits Gordon-Levitt and Willis as the younger and older version of the same guy. Time travel is an invention of the future used by the mob. When the mob tires of someone, they toss their victim 30 years into the past where a hired gun, a looper, is ready to shoot to kill, no questions asked. That has been Joe’s job (Gordon-Levitt) which he’s ready to do even if it’s himself (Willis). The real big kick in the pants is that we know Bruce Willis is not going to go down without a fight. And, if anyone can outsmart the system, it’s going to be the older Joe.

Time travel stories are inevitably about changing something in time and dealing with the repercussions. The professor always says, in the most typical time travel movies, not to disturb anything, not to interact with anything! Well, in “Looper,” characters from the past, present and future are at war with each other! Then there’s the other old reliable: What if you could go back in time and stop something terrible from happening? When we reach that point, we lose some of the mystery of the film. But some things resist easy answers. That’s where Emily Blunt comes in.

There’s a moment in “Looper,” not having to do with gunfire or the threat of violence or imminent death. It is a truly unexpected little moment that cues us to something deeper. Emily Blunt has just completed a long day of chores on her house out in the middle of nowhere. She kicks back on the porch and relaxes. She opens an imaginary pack of cigarettes and pretends to have a smoke. It’s not too long before we’re right back into the tension of this finely structured plot. But, for that moment, we’re made a aware that here’s a character with a whole set of issues and reasons to need to find a way to cope with her life. She also happens to be a character that emerges as far more significant than anyone had imagined. The trick to a really good time travel story is to demonstrate that even a butterfly is important to the chain of events. Too many times in movies, the subject of the woman alone in the house is dismissed as just another butterfly. Not here and Ms. Blunt is up to the task.

Leave a comment

Filed under Entertainment, Movie Reviews, Time Travel