JFK Assassination 50 years later and Richard Matheson’s ‘Duel’

Dennis Weaver in Steven Spielberg's "Duel," written by Richard Matheson

Dennis Weaver in Steven Spielberg’s “Duel,” written by Richard Matheson

One of the great writers for “The Twilight Zone,” Richard Matheson, passed away this year. As we observe that fateful date in Dallas, November 22, 1963, I think of how one man created art out of the processing of his emotions from that event. You might find this to be a surprise but “Duel,” the short story about a man fighting for his life against a demonic semi-trailer truck, that went on to become Steven Spielberg’s first major movie, has its origins in the Kennedy assassination. It’s not a direct link. It’s more based on a significantly deep dark feeling of despair and dread.

Matheson and a friend were out playing a game of golf when they got news of the assassination that day. As they were driving home, a semi truck was tailgating them and ran them off the road. Instantly, a story was born. As Matheson explains, in an interview you can view here, “It sounds gruesome but often a writer will go through some awful experience and then write something based on that experience.”

There is much said about how America lost its innocence on November 22, 1963. That’s not to say that America was innocent to begin with. But, on that day, something broke. The hopes and dreams pinned to one particular man were lost. On that day, suddenly, the lights went out and we were in pitch black. It would be a very dark path ahead. What Matheson is wrestling with in “Duel” is coming to grips with something so irrational, so surreal.

Indirectly, Matheson is asking the sort of questions anyone would have asked after the assassination: How could something like this happen? Why would someone do this? Who would do this? The tragic event in Dallas is replaced in Matheson’s story by a deranged killer in a semi truck. And the fact that the killer lurks out of view refers to the mystery that, even today, is attached to the assassination.

The main character has a wonderfully symbolic name. He’s just, Mann. And the trucker out to kill him also has the apt name of, Keller, so close to, killer. It’s towards the end of the story that Mann sees that name, Keller, on the trucker’s cab. It provides some relief, just as having any name, like Lee Harvey Oswald, seems to provide some comfort from the unknown. But, much in the way that Oswald is, even today, shrouded in mystery, so the name of Keller is of little help in solving the mystery that Mann confronts. Why has this trucker targeted him?

In this excerpt from “Duel,” we get a taste of Mann’s dreadful situation and the eerie similarity between Mann, a vulnerable driver in his old economy car, and a president in a motorcade:

You never know, he thought. You just never know. You drift along, year after year, presuming certain values to be fixed; like being able to drive on a public thoroughfare without somebody trying to murder you. You come to depend on that sort of thing. Then something occurs and all bets are off. One shocking incident and all the years of logic and acceptance are displaced and, suddenly, the jungle is in front of you again. Man, part animal, part angel. Where had he come across that phrase? He shivered.

By 1971, when “Duel” was broadcast as a television movie, America was still quite haunted by the assassination and dogged by all that had happened since. There is much said about how the tumultuous ’60s began on November 22, 1963 and would only come to an end after another disturbing event, August 9, 1974, the resignation of President Nixon brought on my the Watergate scandal. America in 1971 was in the very thick of the ’60s under that timetable, with no end in sight to the war in Vietnam.

Uncertainty ruled the day. It was a tumultuous era mired in a fog of confusion and recrimination. It is this uneasy feeling, that seemed without end, that can be both specific and universal, that Matheson taps into in this story.

For those who tuned in to view the TV movie version of “Duel,” many may have just tuned in for a tightly written horror movie but many may have also picked up on how this particular horror movie seemed to be just right for the times. Mann, in the end, gets to slay his Goliath but it leaves him empty and without answers.


Filed under JFK, Kennedy Assassination, Richard Matheson, The Twilight Zone

4 responses to “JFK Assassination 50 years later and Richard Matheson’s ‘Duel’

  1. This is a great post, Henry. I’m a huge fan of the movie “Duel” but I had no idea of the story behind the story. In fact, I didn’t even know that Richard Matheson was the genius who penned it. So much more interesting now to know how it came about. You’ve made me want to rewatch the film and really appreciate the small nuances I missed before.

    And your conclusion is spot on. Mann got his revenge (so to speak), but as you said, it didn’t feel like much of a victory. Much in the same way capturing and learning the identity of Kennedy’s assassin provided some closure, but it certainly didn’t feel like anybody won. It didn’t change the fact that Kennedy was dead.

    Very nicely written.

  2. Well done, Henry. “Duel” is a rarity, something that worked beautifully as a short story and also as an adapted screenplay. Like Spielberg’s later “Jaws” and Hitchcock’s “The Birds”, it perfectly captures that fear that strikes when the ordinary becomes twisted without warning.

    It’s remarkable how talented writers such as Matheson could mine simple experiences such as this and turn them into riveting stories. He did it on The Twilight Zone repeatedly, as did Rod Serling himself, and he does it here in a gripping tale that’s more frightening than any conventional bogeyman. We might be able to avoid Jason Voorhees up at Camp Crystal Lake, but how do we avoid driving? Flying? Walking to work?

    “Duel” is a film that fits its time, yes, but it still works very effectively today, as does The Twilight Zone. Good writing always stands the test of time. Kudos for the good writing you’ve done here as well, Henry.

Leave a Reply