Tag Archives: Art

The De Luca Effect in Comics

To be or not to be effected.

I am not afraid to ask questions on things that somehow are not on my radar or I cannot recall or whatever the case might be. Sometimes this happens deep within an interview, possibly not to be found but for our most loyal listeners and readers. Anyway, to cut to the chase, I recently brought up in a conversation the “De Luca Effect” in comics theory. I asked my guest for clarification since I found myself bumping up on limited time to check myself. My initial reaction is to take such scholarly-sounding terms with a healthy dose of skepticism: Is this actually some common enough technique going by another name? Maybe it’s something I’ve done in my own comics without putting a label to it. And then I inevitably circle back, ready to withhold any further judgment, take it in and see what mileage we get.

So, what exactly is the De Luca Effect? It certainly has a portentous sound to it, doesn’t it? Well, put on the spot, I didn’t know its origins and no one outside of certain academic circles would dare a guess either. It turns out this term was coined in a 2008 essay by comics historian Paul Gravett which features a comic dating back to 1975 by Gianni De Luca (1927-1991), an Italian cartoonist who, in order to efficiently condense his comics adaptation of Hamlet, depicted a series of moments of the main character, in multiple iterations of himself, reciting various lines all on the same page or series of pages, free-floating without using comics panels. Alright, that makes sense to me now. I recognize Gravett’s observations here as a useful reference point in a better appreciation and understanding of the comics medium.  And my initial hunch wasn’t exactly off. You can’t tell me there haven’t been any number of instances where a character in a comic appears in multiple images on the same page, well before De Luca. That said, Gravett’s essay provides a point of entry to discuss the language of the comics medium, the reliance we have to the comics panel that acts as a container from one moment to the next on a page, and to the very concept of time within the pages of comics. What if we did away with the traditional confines of the comics panel? Would the comic still makes sense? Yes. It would indeed still make sense. Gravett’s choice to focus upon De Luca’s Hamlet brings that home. It’s also quite a nice touch that the featured comic finds us with one of the most uncanny of cultural icons, that most enigmatic and troubled of souls going off in all directions, none other than Hamlet. Sometimes, the stars align perfectly in place.

And so an academic term is born.

The beauty of Gravett’s essay is how he builds upon his first observations on Gianni De Luca’s use of multiple images used in the service of the comics narrative. This jumping off point provides a platform to expound upon the impulse to break from certain established comics formats. Gravett uses this opportunity to comment on the impulse to push limits from such varied cartoonists as Winsor McCay to Joe Sacco. Gravett more than hints that comics panels are too conventional but let’s just say that I’m hardly swayed that they need to be phased out. Any fan of comics will be intrigued by Gravett’s comments with their dash of controversy tossed in for good measure. I would argue that certain formats, like comics panels, are sustained for a multitude of practical reasons: as much for the sake of clarity as for narrative momentum. Just like in other mediums, the impulse is always there to subvert the conventional way of doing things, break the fourth wall and so forth. Would you prefer a work of comics made up solely of panels, no panels or a combination of both? Well, it all depends, doesn’t it?

Where art thou, De Luca Effect?

The fact is that cartoonists are a very contrarian lot. I should know. I am one. Of course, without a doubt, they will be the first to put this peculiar vehicle of their creative efforts through its paces. Cartoonists will be the first to knock the hell out of the machine they are working with, customize it into whatever hot rod ultimately works best for them. Even Gravett must admit in his essay that comics artists do what they do and don’t easily fit into a theory: When Gravett asked Dave Gibbons about his being influenced by De Luca (as he very well should have been, according to Gravett), Gibbons said he had never heard of the De Luca Effect. Gravett states: “When I asked Gibbons, he was unaware of De Luca’s device and, what’s more, he told me he had never heard Frank Miller discuss it either.” It is the comics critic, whom I most humbly count myself among, who will emerge, reach this or that conclusion, take note of this technique or that so-called innovation. But it is ultimately the comics fan who makes the final judgment on whether any given work is something more than fancy and really worth a hoot.

Excerpt from Il Commissario Spada.

To put a bow on all this, I need to say that cartoonists are doing several things all at once, including pushing the limits of their craft. One person’s innovation might be another person’s way of practical problem-solving, finding a way to keep things interesting. And so I leave you with an excerpt from the series, Il Commissario Spada (1970-1982) another work by De Luca, with writer Gian Luigi Gonano, which echoes his so-called, effect. In the above excerpt we see the same character at different moments of time that are punctuated with panels. For this comics project, De Luca and the writer were not necessarily engaging with comics trailblazing and lofty thoughts of spatial concerns or, at least, that was only one component to their activity. No, in this case, the subject matter was the most compelling part to this comic. It is considered groundbreaking in the sense that it is a comic about crime and violence in a Catholic magazine for young readers, unheard of at the time. The panels do their job quite nicely. It is only, after the fact, that comics scholars appear and provide their analysis. At the end of the day, panels are simply part of the artist’s toolkit, to be used as needed and even to be honored as part of the family.

3 Comments

Filed under Comics, Comics Scholarship

Kay Sohini interview: New York City and Beyond

Kay Sohini is an artist, writer and researcher. With this debut graphic memoir, This Beautiful, Ridiculous City, published by Ten Speed Graphic, Sohini provides a fun and highly accessible look at New York City from a number of vantage points–and it is even more than that (read my review). In this interview, we unpack as much as possible. Sohini is known for distilling complex subjects through the language of comics, a more precise and concise format that combines image and text. Sohini’s coming-of-age graphic memoir is a delight to read. It evokes an effortless grace but it is actually built upon a very sophisticated framework. Sohini, after all, holds a PhD in English. Her dissertation, focusing on the comics medium, was created as a comic book, her first foray into creating comics. Sohini’s essays and comics have appeared in The Washington Post and The Nib, among other places.

Moving from academic scholarship to general readership. Excerpt from Sohini’s PhD dissertation, Drawing Unbelonging.

You can say that This Beautiful, Ridiculous City is a transition for Sohini from the academic world to the world of general readership. In that regard, the book proves to be a success. The specificity of scholarly pursuits can certainly get bogged down in jargon and navigate within a more narrow viewpoint but readers must find out for themselves. In many cases, there is plenty of common ground to be found. I think the through line in Sohini’s work is a drive toward clarity, a heart-felt desire to share observations and insights. Isn’t that what we hope to find in our best reading experiences, especially in nonfiction?

Our conversation is easygoing. I do my best not to fall into just talking about New York City even though that is at the heart of Sohini’s book. As Sohini states: “This book is about a lot of things. At its core, it’s about literature and being starstruck about New York. But it is also about abuse, inequity and social commentary.” And how appropriate to have New York act as a sort of container for further discussion.

Excerpt from This Beautiful, Ridiculous City.

And so we engage in a good bit of shop talk as well as share a love for the Big Apple. I must say that this love of New York City hits me at my core. I created a graphic novel about New York City many years ago and the sentiments expressed in that work still hold true. I sort of stumbled into creating that work without much of any plan on how to promote it but definitely with a deep desire to bring it to life. And that’s the stuff that dreams are made of. That’s the stuff that fuels one’s love for New York. That’s, no doubt, the stuff that led Sohini to pursue her own love letter to New York City.

Enjoy the video interview and, as always, I welcome your support in the way of comments, views and Likes. I don’t know exactly how we are to resolve the current troubled times we face in detail but it will involve voting. Beyond that, we can do many things out in the community and we can support each other’s good work. With that in mind, I highly recommend that you seek out Sohini’s book which is about a lot of things, most notably at this crisis point, it is about an immigrant’s struggle to achieve the American Dream.

Comments Off on Kay Sohini interview: New York City and Beyond

Filed under Comics, Interviews

This Beautiful Ridiculous City by Kay Sohini book review

This Beautiful Ridiculous City. Kay Sohini. Ten Speed Press. 2025. 128pp. $24.99.

If you are a creative person, you have most likely fallen in love with New York City and perhaps that feeling has stayed with you. In a city with an endless amount of stories to tell, it seems that everyone who dares to dream of an artistic life, and has the means or sheer will to do so, has taken a bite out of the Big Apple. Kay Sohini, a talented artist-writer, presents her take on her own love affair with NYC in her debut graphic memoir, This Beautiful Ridiculous City. The title says it all. This is the city that never sleeps , an amazing amalgam of high and low culture along with manic highs and lows. Everyone has their story to tell about this quintessential metropolis and Sohini provides quite a distinctive visual narrative.

Sohini has a way of inviting the reader into her world that is sincere and authentic. I felt quite at home as Sohini leads the way, setting the tone by sharing about her love for New York: the sights and sounds; the artists and writers; the euphoric feeling of being there. This introduction dovetails into a look back at Sohini’s childhood and upbringing in the suburbs of Calcutta: a slower pace; a smaller scene. I think therein lies the conflict: a need by Sohini to seek greener pastures while also coming to terms with and honoring her family back home once she does leave for New York. It won’t be a spoiler to say that Sohini does ultimately find a balance. What transpires within this delightful book is an utterly genuine coming-of-age story with all the insights and epiphanies any reader could want.

This book is filled with page after page of essential information for anyone interested in visiting New York, or just curious about what makes a great city tick. This is also a compelling story about one young person’s journey of self-discovery. And there are wonderful extended moments when it all seems to coalesce. One such scene is a two-page spread that well represents the soul of the book: a mother and daughter conversation about food. Sohini explains that she was kept out of the kitchen as a child. Now, as an adult, she hungers for every recipe detail she can get from her mother.

Another two-page spread provides a delightful insider guide to the best kept secrets on where to find amazing Indian food but you’ll have to leave Manhattan to find it. In the end, life in the big city is made up of a vast array of struggles, failures and sublime victories. Who is to say just how great a victory a favorite restaurant can provide on any given day? Sohini will help you appreciate New York City with her crisp and thoughtful writing and drawing. This graphic memoir is truly a victory.

3 Comments

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews, Graphic Memoir

Tongues by Anders Nilsen graphic novel review

Tongues. Anders Nilsen. Pantheon. 2025. 368pp. $35.

Among the most anticipated works in comics for 2025, the collected Tongues (368 pages) by Anders Nilsen rises to the top. The other work by Nilsen that is similar in scope and content is the equally mammoth collected Big Questions (658 pages), published by Drawn & Quarterly in 2012. Both books are profoundly philosophical. While Big Questions is, more or less, pared down to focus on the entanglements of a few small creatures, Tongues bring in gods to ponder, and engage in, the fate of humanity. We may feel in our own time that we are at the mercy of the gods and so all the more reason to engage with this monumental work in comics.

Settling into this book, it charms you right from the very first page and I was instantly lost within its rhythms. While based upon three tales from Aeschylus, there is no need to fear any required prior knowledge. In fact, you may know more than you realize. Perhaps Leda and the Swan rings a bell. But, no matter. These are timeless, primal and utterly accessible stories. What does matter is simply allowing yourself to be swept away by Nilsen’s masterful storytelling: smartly-paced narrative inextricably linked to beautifully rendered artwork.

Nothing is quite right in Tongues. It is as if the world has been tilted off its axis just enough to cause recurring imbalance. The bad guys always have the upper hand and yet, as one god concludes, patience is a virtue. That is if you’re willing to wait around for at least a thousand years. Everything is relative. And so it goes as the narrative alternates between human scale and god scale. What is one death in the big scheme of things? And then another and another? One war bleeds into the next. Will a child lead the way? Ah, perhaps nothing so obvious. Again, it all comes back to the mysterious and enigmatic way this story unfolds.

Poor Prometheus.

Anders Nilsen’s career as an artist has been a gradual and steady progression. He first got on people’s radars in 2005 with his long-form comic, Dogs and Water. This was followed in 2007 with his heart-breaking account of the life and death of his partner, Cheryl Weaver, Don’t Go Where I Can’t Follow. Look at the work going back to the early years and you find very simple drawing, even stick figure characters. The first section to his monumental Big Questions has its relatively rough patches with very simple drawings, yet always hinting at deeper sophistication. Today, Nilsen is at the very top, among the best artists working today, whatever the medium, without a doubt.

That brings us back to this latest book and Prometheus with his perpetual patience, sure that one day an eagle will suddenly tire of the daily punishment it has been tasked with of gutting him open and flying away with his liver. Specifically, Zeus punished Prometheus for giving humans the gift of fire. All very profound and fanciful stuff to be sure. Nilsen has an uncanny way of being able to evoke complexity, both human and godly, mired in a thousand contradictions. At his best, Nilsen manages to shed some light on the virtually incomprehensible. The fires raging in California can’t help but, at least for me, come to mind. Profound to the point of unbearable. Nilsen’s creative journey has been one of distilling the greatest pain and finding some artful consolation.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

ANATOMY OF COMICS book review

Anatomy of Comics. Damien MacDonald. Flammarion. 2022. $40.

This is a companion book to a touring exhibition honoring the comics medium from the La Caixa Foundation in Spain. I came across this a while back and I’d meant to write a piece about it. I was instantly drawn to the striking cover. If you’re a fan of comics, do you recognize the artist? Given the nature of pop culture and media, it doesn’t matter if this image was, at one point, in wider circulation. Today, it needs to fight for attention with everything else. This is, in fact, by world-renown comics artist Charles Burns. It was originally a silkscreen print published in a limited edition by l’A.P.A.A.R. in 1985 and printed by Frederic de Broutelles. It has graced the cover of Metal Hurlant (Issue #120, 1986) as well as Dope Comix, Juxtapoz and El Vibora. But, I think it’s safe to say, it has gained a new life as the cover to this collection of exemplary comics art. As I suggest, this work of art, alas, is not the Mona Lisa of comics (not in terms of wide recognition) but figures mostly within the world of the comics cognoscenti.

Anatomy of Comics (2022) and PeePee PooPoo #1 (2024).

So, I take a bit of issue with up-and-coming cartoonist Caroline Cash for taking this Burns work and making it her own, with a few of her own flourishes, for the latest issue of her comic book series. No doubt, it’s a very clever tribute but she provides no attribution. The average reader will simply assume it is her own work. And, sure, it has become a mantra to “steal like an artist” and perhaps Burns is okay with the homage. The longer view is this: an artist is always aiming for artistic integrity and that takes time, perhaps a lifetime, to truly find one’s way. That brings me right back to this collection of comics art that honors that creative process of finding one’s way.

Catalan cartoonist Ricard Opisso Sala (1880-1966).

The act of creating comics that will stand the test of time is not a sprint but a marathon. The name of this exhibition is “Comics, Dreams and History” and what it makes clear is that there’s no room for pretense, not when you’re creating dreams. Damien MacDonald, a cartoonist himself, provides five essays, or monographs, to accompany a mix of short notes on selected pieces in the show. MacDonald sets the tone by stating he’s taking on the role more of an avuncular guide than an academic.

Saint Winsor!

Winsor McCay, it is safe to say, has reached a special and undeniable immortality and so it’s no surprise to find him included, and celebrated, in this book. His work will forever be spoken in the same breathe with any dissertation on the comics medium. It’s interesting to note that there is barely any mention of Art Spiegelman. Many of the other all-stars make a splash in this book: Winsor McCay, R. Crumb, Jack Kirby, Milton Caniff, but no Spiegelman tribute. And perhaps this is an example of the fluctuating waves of the never-ending assessments still being made on a relatively new art form. Basically, I don’t think it’s a deliberate slight at all but it does go to show that there’s always room for rethinking until you finally reach a certain undeniable apex, such as Saint Winsor!

Spanish cartoonist Antonio Hernandez Palacios (1921-2000).

The one mention in the book of Art Spiegelman is worth a mention here and that is in regards to a manifesto that was signed by Art and other notable comics artists. The following appeared in 1973 in Short Order Comix #1:

“It is the artist’s responsibility to hate, loathe and despise–fromica! Comics must be personal. The artist must strive to create quality product. It is our fervent belief that certain comics should still be trees! It is the reader’s responsibility to understand the artist. It is also the artist’s responsibility to understand the artist! Swiping is bad, experimentation is good!”

Milton Caniff (1907-1988).

Since we’re dealing with quotes, let’s try another. This one is by Will Eisner and is also included in this book. Perhaps in a mix of honesty and self-deprecation, Eisner summed up the cartoonist’s lot this way:

“I was a frustrated writer, a frustrated painter. And here, for the first time, was this marvelous opportunity that happens to any creative person once in a lifetime. Suddenly, there appears a medium, a receptacle, that takes your inaptitudes in both fields, puts them together, and comes out with an aptitude.”

— Will Eisner

That brings to mind a similar quote by Charles Schulz, this one is not in this book but from an interview with journalist Michael Johnson. I recall reading another version of it somewhere else too, as it’s basically a stock answer. This is not something you’ll easily find referenced anymore. Schulz is now Saint Charles, after all.

“My life is a story of almosts. I am almost a writer and almost an artist, so I do this for a living.”

— Charles Schulz

The flame keeps flickering, in and out, until either it dies off or it shines on, depending upon who leaps in to advocate for a legacy. Young people promote other young people, from one generation to the next. Right or wrong, one’s peers always seem to be of utmost importance. Only time will tell. One star’s once bright future may face a correction, flicker out and evaporate. There was a time in the wilderness even for undisputed icons, from the Mona Lisa to The Great Gatsby. Perhaps this book’s greatest purpose is to bring back a relatively obscure work by Charles Burns by having it on its cover, a way to cast a spotlight on it. And then unexpected things happen: like a newcomer upon the scene sees it and takes that same image for her own purposes. So, not trying to step on anyone’s toes. This is a tricky business when it comes to creating images and worthy of further discussion, which is an ongoing exploration for us folk interested in the study of comics and actually making comics.

If you have read any book on the comics medium, then you go to the head of the class. This one I found refreshing in its conversational tone and decidedly European vantage point. It’s a good solid overview and MacDonald provides many interesting observations. He provides an extended relaxed style that he pursues to good use as when he tackles the subject of secret identities or the power of comics to inform. Someone new to comics will find this very helpful and there’s enough nuance to keep more serious readers engaged.

John Romita (b. 1930).

The main goal here is to appreciate the comics medium and get a sense of what it takes to create something as inventive and original as the frenzied character observing his own eyeball from deep within his own skull. Charles Burns was a plucky 30-year-old artist in 1985 when the art on the cover of this book was first published. Burns was well on his way and listening to something telling him to step on the gas and create mind-blowing comics. This book is for everyone who enjoys mind-blowing comics and aspires to create some of their own. Good luck! It won’t be easy but it is well worth the effort no matter how long it may take you.

Charles Burns with PeePee PooPoo #1.

But, hang on, we’re not done yet. I am not one to ever leave well enough alone in the pursuit of attempting to get the full picture. My guess was that Charles Burns was fine with Caroline Cash’s tribute. As the above photo demonstrates, the maestro is more than fine with it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics

The Complete I, René Tardi, P.O.W. graphic novel review

The Complete I, Rene Tardi, P.O.W. (Fantagraphics, 2024, $99.99)

Guest Review by Paul Buhle

To say that Jacques Tardi is a major figure in comic art and in the development of contemporary comic art, its meaning and its expression, is insufficient. To many thoughtful readers,  Tardi has not only the brilliance of the artist but also the courage and resolve of the resister within a world where “resistance” is often described as futile and its activists are derided as a public embarrasment when not a menace.

There is something about Tardi’s work that is, for many readers including this one, deeply personal. CLR James, the great Pan African historian but also world-historic writer on the game of cricket, remarked that a good writer can say “it happened” but only a great writer (or artist) can say, “I see it, myself.” And make that claim credible. Again and again, Tardi shows us convincingly what he has seen and by doing so, why it is important. That the son appears always young while talking to the father in various stages of 1930s-40s life is a convention to make this personal story possible.

If another prefatory remark to a review of this trilogy does not overburden the reader, I would add that Tardi is the master of oral history, a “field” so recent that it has never reached academic respectability and so rooted in human history that it surely goes back to the earliest tribal communal expressions. The trilogy is an extended oral history, easily one of the first nonfiction efforts in comic form and almost certainly the longest.

The first volume.

He has been at this work a long time. Back in the 1990s, Tardi produced a two volume comic about the massive truma suffered during the First World War. It Was A War of the Trenches, noted for its realism, was followed by Goddamn This War!, praised for its accuracy as well as its sardonic, “black” humor.

In this stunning new three volume set, with its art intermittently tinted, Tardi tells the story of his father but by extension, the story of many millions of participants in war, non-participant victims and those destined or trapped to see the horrors up close.

In the first volume of the trilogy,  Tardi’s wife and collaborator Dominique Grange offers five large  prefatory pages of photos and drawings. Tardi himself chimes in with three more, mostly an acknowledgment of assistance from various quarters. They are paying homage to a generation fast slipping away. They are also telling younger people about their own collective past, their collective responsibility to French history, sometimes heroic, sometime monstrous (think of colonialism), but real and continuing.

These books are, crucially, also a testament to oral history of a certain kind, in this case assissted but only assisted by diaries that Tardi’s father had kept. A handful of other artists working on subjects ranging from the Spanish Civil War of the 1930s to the Vietnam War and the Israeli Occuption of Gaza have run up against the familiar problems. “Truth,” if the word is useful at all, is the truth of the story, the vividness and detail of memory rather than its factual accuracy. The son asking his father about a past that would be more painful than pleasant to detail, adds himself to the story.

It is oral history, after all, that allows the depth of detail but also a running dialogue about the details and meaning of memory. At every stage, generational conflict is on display.

A son who becomes a father resents the tedium of small town life and the dull certainties of a civil service career. A grandson, obviously devoting years to collecting a story, nevertheless needles his father, especially but not only about recruitment into the military and repeated re-enlistment. How could one choose an authoritarian organization full of class privilege, romanticizing violence and practicing violence on colonial victims from Africa to Asia? These are good questions answered with the stoicism of the working class or lower classes anywhere to military enlistment: a feeling of few alternatives for young people, and the often-later-regretted impulse to get away from home and “see the world.”

But there is more here, of course. This is also the story of Grange, the scriptwriter proper, Tardi’s partner in life and the daughter of another veteran of the same war. Her father died too early for Grange to get a detailed reminiscence, but this trilogy is very much a partnership. A recent outing by the pair, Elise and the New Partisans, in another fine Fantagraphics production, tells the story of the courageous radicals from the new left era, seen through the eyes of a Maoist-feminist militant.

The “Partisan” label has remained since the 1940s a crucial sign-of-sorts in French culture and politics. For outsiders, the “Resistance” is the official narrative: Marshall DeGaulle and the Free French Army march on Paris and heroically end the German occupation. As the concluding volume of I, father Tardi notes with special bitterness, De Gaulle had been off protecting the French empire in Africa from anti-colonial rebels while the dangerous and heroic antifascist struggle took place within France itself.

That the influence of Communists weighed heavily among the Partisans, a key source of post-war Left political popularity, offered another reason for a contrary and “official” narrative shared most of all by Americans. Not so in much of Europe: even the horrors of Stalinism in the War and after could not abolish the heroism of Partisans across large parts of the continent. The artist titled his latest volume The New Partisans for a reason: the memory has not gone away, even as the last of the antifascist underground pass, receiving good obituaries as far from France as the New York Times. The memory of the Partisans is not only a celebration of life and commemoration of bravery. It is also a reminder of the cowardice of the collaborators.

Rene himself remains, however, distant from all poltiical parties, saving much of his bitterness for the phony heroism of DeGaulle. Likewise for the bourgeois French citizens who made fortunes on the black market, likewise for the French police who rounded up Jews for deportation to the Death Camps, joining the Resistance just ten days before the liberation of Paris.  A hard-bitten veteran of real war, he saves the rest of his bitterness, the largest part, for the French Army leadership and the politicians who might have crushed the Germans in their first violation of the Versailles Treaty of 1919, but waited and waited. By the time they mobilized, the Wehrmacht was overwhelming, while French officaldom stupidly counted upon their revised Maginot Line to halt the German march. And then, among the officer corps, fled the Germans alongside the refugees, throwing down their guns along the way.

All this reflects a bitterness that revives a bitterness that he feels by generational sensibility to the soldiers and civilians of the First World War, the grandparents of Tardi and also of Grange. They survived but many of their own relatives did not. The false expectations of glory and easy victory, the painful sense that the Germans had been pushed back only because the Americans entered the war, and above all the horrors of the trenches left behind a collective sense of exhaustion. Tardi’s parents grow up under this shadow, a postmaster and postmistress who are satisfied, more than satisfied, to be civil servants with a quiet life in small (and to him, boring) French village.

Thus Tardi’s father, restless in adolescence and feeling a sense of nationalism at the first stirrings of German revanche expressions, makes his great error (or so Tardi the son believes) enlisting in the army. Tardi’s youthful disdain in this decision is perhaps the only real moment of disagreement in the comic, reflecting conversations that might have happened or might have taken place mainly in the young man’s mind, finalized on paper.

A kind of generational peace is achieved, perhaps, when Rene recounts the only violence that he actually committed: in his day running a tank, he runs over German soldiers so thoroughly that only traces of body parts remain, a memory that haunts him for years. Still, even this apparently guilt-ridden retelling is an artistic re-enactment.

And perhaps that disjuncture between reality and retelling  is the last important conceptual point of this trilogy. The artist and his scriptwriter cannot really go back in history. And yet their effort to do so, based on an informal but deeply felt and ardently pursued oral history, father to son, is something remarkable, something still little seen in a comic art world where non-fiction remains a fairly small category with no rules.

What does the enormous achievement of Jacques Tardi but also Dominique Grange mean for comics in particular, for comic art and a fairly recent method of the telling of some large and complicated history? These are not likely questions asked by the casual comics reader or even the armchair critic. Or I should say: not asked easily.  The trilogy under review will be at the center of scholars and reviewers, also readers of French history in particular, for a long time. And for good reason.

Paul Buhle

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Hurricane Nancy Art: Making Sense of the News

Here is a new work of art by Hurricane Nancy. We all have our thoughts on current events these days. It can be a lot to process and sometimes art can help lead the way. In this latest piece, it looks like someone is being torn in two directions without any clear path ahead. Well, time will tell.

Be sure to visit Hurricane Nancy and check out her art for sale.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics

Eric Drooker: NAKED CITY interview

Eric Drooker is that consummate artist, the ideal artist that young people generally aspire to be. Take a look at the short film below to gain some perspective on Mr. Drooker. This is a short film he did in New York in 1981, a tumultuous time with undeniable relevance to today; a timeless film. We will always need to remind ourselves we have nothing to fear but fear itself. I had the honor of putting together this studio visit with the artist. We discuss his latest graphic novel, Naked City, published by Dark Horse Comics. In it, we find a set of characters, representative of all humanity, who are basically reminding themselves that they have nothing to fear but fear itself.

Born and raised on Manhattan Island, Eric Drooker began to paste his art on the streets at night as a teenager. Since then, his drawings and posters have become a familiar sight in the global street art movement, and his paintings appear frequently on covers of the New Yorker.

Eric Drooker in his studio.

His first book, Flood, won the American Book Award, followed by Blood Song (soon to be a feature film). Naked City is the third volume in Drooker’s City Trilogy. His graphic novels have been translated into numerous languages in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. After designing the animation for the film Howl, he was hired for a project at DreamWorks Animation.

The City Trilogy: Flood (1992), Blood Song (2002), Naked City (2024).

Drooker’s art is in the permanent collection of the Whitney Museum, the Museum of Modern Art, the Brooklyn Museum, and the Library of Congress. He is available for speaking engagements and frequently gives slide lectures at colleges and universities. Mr. Drooker’s art is available for sale at his website.

At heart, Eric Drooker is a street artist with all the energy that comes with it: everything from his zest for creating work to his zeal for talking about his art. Just give the floor over to him and he’ll work his magic, maybe even play the harmonica if necessary.

The New Yorker, October 28, 2024, The Money Issue. “Crushing Wealth” by Eric Drooker.

“Troubadour” by Eric Drooker.

The New Yorker, March 6, 1995, “Under Bridges” by Eric Drooker.

“Tomorrow” by Eric Drooker.

While I was in his studio, he picked up a copy of The New Yorker magazine, with his art gracing the cover, an issue published just the prior week, and launched into a talk about how the magazine cover functions as a form of street art. While the magazine has a healthy readership, it also reaches a vast number of people who regularly consume just the art on the cover as they come across the magazine on display in various locales whether in a bookstore or in the dentist’s office.

The New Yorker, November 9, 2009, “Autumn in Central Park” by Eric Drooker.

The New Yorker, August 6, 2007, oil on canvas, 20″x16″, “Urban Jungle” by Eric Drooker.

Naked City got on my radar earlier this year and I’m so grateful that I got an advance copy. My friend, and colleague in the comics world, Paul Buhle, wrote the review for us here at Comics Grinder. Without a doubt, Naked City is a significant graphic novel with the added distinction of being part of a trilogy, part of a great artistic process. We, as artists, can and must do some planning ahead on projects while, at the same time, allow the art process to do its thing. Such is the case with Naked City. It is as much a graphic novel about being an artist as it is simply about being human and being true to yourself.

“The Argument” by Eric Drooker.

4 Comments

Filed under Comics, Eric Drooker, Interviews

NAKED CITY by Eric Drooker graphic novel review

NAKED CITY:  A Graphic Novel. Eric Drooker. Milwaukie, Oregon: Dark Horse Books, 2024. 329pp. $29.99.

Guest Review by Paul Buhle

For many an aged connoisseur of film and television history, the title of Eric Drooker’s new comic conjures up fond, familiar images. A 1948 film offered the nearest Hollywood approach to Italian “New Realism,” and was directed by Jules Dassin,a left-wing film director about to flee the US and the blacklist for a legendary role in Greece (think Never On Sunday). On the surface a mere “policier,” it captured the grit of Manhattan as a manufacturing city, including a police chase on foot through crowds of working class types, never seen in quite this way before or perhaps after. “Naked City” made a titular reappearance for good reasons, one of the finest “New York Era” television efforts (1958-63) which began each episode with a vivid view of Manhattan, and plots that often featured police as social workers dealing sympathetically with broken lives.

Drooker himself actually fled New York for Berkeley, decades ago. But he co-founded the annual, hard-hitting anthology World War III Illustrated before departing, and has returned spectacularly—in his dreams, that is.

We are in the world of existential experience. Artists and musicians trying to make a living and make their way and also find some kind of companionship, where possible. Street scenes, park scenes, people who aren’t nearly as dangerous or unfriendly as they look, and cops who are a lot more casually brutal than the press would have us believe. Drooker, as in an earlier Manhattan GN, Flood, does not need much dialogue and some pages have hardly any at all.

Let’s try another analogy. One of the most useful observations of European art historians generations ago captured a crucial turn away from narrow religious art. For a thousand years, more or less, painters had drawn human beings at close quarters, engaged in one or another religious expression. And then, not necessarily for non-religious purposes, the landscape began to appear as something in itself, something to  be seen, reflected upon, captured in art.

It was a giant step forward, anticipating the following steps in which humans would reappear but in a new light. Bruegel was already there, in a sense, but by the nineteenth century, a flood of art, more and more secular, placed ordinary people in ordinary lives. Or exotic people in their ordinary lives somewhere far from the Euro-centered world. Only one step remained, in the lowly comic pages of the yellow press, to allow ordinary as well as extraordinary people to talk, make jokes, swear, and generally carry on.

Thus comic art, long unrecognized as any kind of art. Drooker brings us back to landscapes, but as cityscapes. Interiors and exteriors alike, not to mention the subway caverns, not to mention music venues. Not to mention balmy days, and snowstorm days, tenement to public park.

The plot is fairly thin and the characters not developed with notable complexity because Drooker wishes to direct the reader’s attention elsewhere. Our protagonist, a young woman coming from a rough background, has aspirations as a singer. She naturally can’t pay even a meager rent without finding some kind of work when nearly every kind is obnoxious as well as unrewarding. By accident, she becomes an artist’s model and we enter the world of the artist himself.

Here, any comic art volume will poke around a little, raising inevitable analogies to the comic artist’s own artistic vision, work and troubles. This guy is more than a generation older than our protagonist, has no apparent sexual designs upon her but also no sense of a career more successful than following his agent or exhibitor’s advice. He may not come to a happy ending because hardly anyone does here. The City is rough on the ordinary aspirant to artistic fame or even relative stability. The lonely streets are too dangerous, just for starters.

She is lucky enough to escape the worst dangers except the sense of being alone in a world of skyscrapers, tenements and offices. She is lucky enough to be recognized as a singer with talent. But something is definitely missing.

Drooker is a socialist and environmentalist as his art has always explained to readers. He does not thump any key here, no political causes are highlighted, if the plight of the working stiff is always on display. He is pointing in another direction. She is undocumented and in that way always endangered,  her memories of her family’s political persecution in Mexico stand for themselves, part of a past that she has left behind except in wistful moments.

She is, finally, one more stranger in the metropolis. Like millions of others facing the same dangers, including deportation. And with similar hopes. She is not allowed her own special songs to them. But she endures.

Actually, it is the Yiddish language short stories and novels about Manhattan from the 1890s to the 1940s that seem the closest to Drooker. Strangers in a language that will remain forever alien West of the Hudson. Inclined toward visionary social solutions based on culture as much as politics, the artist, even the ordinary lover of art, group-music singer or musician to film-maker and even cartoonist, those curious Jews left a mighty legacy that Drooker follows.

Then again, Drooker could also be seen in Tompkins Square Park, where Allen Ginsberg discovered his art on anti-gentrification posters, introduced himself to the artist and began a process that culminated in a Drooker/Ginsberg collaboration of poetry and comics. Quite something to remember. And again, quite the city saga.

Ginsberg discovered Drooker as Drooker had discovered Ginsberg. Together—which is to say a new collection of Ginsberg’s poetry illustrated by Drooker, published in 2006—they created a unique comic. We can appreciate the partnership best with Ginsberg’s words, from Drooker’s website:

Essay by Allen Ginsberg

Drooker’s Illuminations

I first glimpsed Eric Drooker’s odd name on posters pasted on fire-alarm sides, construction walls checkered with advertisements, & lamppost junction boxes in the vortex of Lower East Side Avenues leading to Tompkins Square Park, where radical social dislocation mixed homeless plastic tents with Wigstock transvestite dress-up anniversaries, Rastas sitting on benches sharing spliff, kids with purple Mohawks, rings in their noses ears eyebrows and bellybuttons, adorable or nasty skinheads, wives with dogs & husbands with children strolling past jobless outcasts, garbage, and a bandshell used weekly for folk-grunge concerts, anti-war rallies, squatters’ rights protests, shelter for blanket-wrapped junkies & winos and political thunder music by Missing Foundation, commune-rockers whose logo, an overturned champagne glass with slogan “The Party’s Over,” was spray-painted on sidewalks, apartments, brownstone and brick walled streets.

Eric Drooker’s numerous block-print-like posters announced much local action, especially squatters’ struggles and various mayoral-police attempts to destroy the bandshell & close the Park at night, driving the homeless into notoriously violence-corrupted city shelters. Tompkins Park had a long history of political protest going back before Civil War anti-draft mob violence, memorialized as “. . . a mixed surf of muffled sound, the atheist roar of riot,” in Herman Melville’s The Housetop: A Night Piece (July 1863).

Paul Buhle

4 Comments

Filed under Dark Horse Comics, Eric Drooker

FINAL CUT by Charles Burns graphic novel review

Honestly, this is the only graphic novel that matters right now.

Final Cut. Charles Burns. Pantheon. 2024. 224pp. $34.00.

Honestly, Final Cut is the only graphic novel that matters right now. And we’re about to take a look at it. Everything about it, from the title on down, is true to the artist’s vision. Charles Burns had to invent his place in comics. As he has said himself, the underground comics of the 1960s had receded into the twilight around the time he came of age. There was no alt-comics scene when it was Charles Burns up to bat. He had to create a whole new thing. Yes, there were other cartoonists of his generation in the same boat but Burns brought in such a distinctive and original vision that only a few others could stand alongside. In recent years, perhaps Burns wondered if he could still pull a rabbit out of his hat. Well, that is not asking the right question. It’s more just a matter of when and now we have a new book. Burns’s comics are typically set in the atmospheric woodlands of the Pacific Northwest, circa 1970, and this one is no different. No need to change a winning format.

Boy Meets Girl. Boy Obsesses Over Girl.

It’s a new book following in a well established Burns tradition of alienation nation, just what the doctor ordered if what ails you is a need for the extraordinary. This is the story of one young man’s need for the transcendent, and his inability to rise to the occasion when he comes face to face with it. What’s wrong with him? Maybe it has to do with him being a teenager, a little too young for his own good. When he met the girl, he flinched. He didn’t win her over. Instead, he did quite the opposite: he obsessed over her.

At the movies!

As much as this book is about horror movies, from classics to B-movies, this is also about fan culture and the fans who have a need greater than they can fully express to other people. There is no way that Brian is going to connect on a deep level with Laurie. Maybe when he’s older but not now while he’s in high school and that’s all he’s got. At this point in his life, he is driven to tears by the disturbing ending of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. He took Laurie, on a just-friends-date, to see it at the local movie theater but, no such luck, she didn’t really get it. So, for now, his love of horror movies is all he’s got. And that’s not too bad. He’s a budding filmmaker after all.

My last reading of Charles Burns goes back to the trilogy (X’ed Out, The Hive, Sugar Skull) he did about a decade or so ago. Before that, I read Black Hole when it came out in singles. By comparison, this new full length graphic novel feels as grounded as Black Hole and more accessible, even personal. Brian feels a bit more like an alter ego. The reader is supposed to be sympathetic to Brian. He seems a little off but, at the same time, he seems to be figuring out things at his own pace. For now, he has an unstable mother to attend to and he’s got the afternoon horror movie on local TV to help him cope.

1 Comment

Filed under Charles Burns, Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews