Tag Archives: Books

Craig Thompson Interview: On Comics and Ginseng Roots

Craig Thompson is a cartoonist and the author of the award-winning books Blankets; Good-bye, Chunky Rice; and Habibi. He was born in Michigan in 1975, and grew up in a rural farming community in central Wisconsin. His graphic novel Blankets won numerous industry awards and has been published in nearly twenty languages. Thompson lives in Portland, Oregon. In this interview, Craig Thomspon discusses his new book, Ginseng Roots, published by Pantheon. Publication release date is April 29, 2025 and it is available for pre-order.

You could count on buying it cheap from China.

Ginseng Roots explores class divide, agriculture, holistic healing, the 300-year-long trade relationship between China and North America, childhood labor, and the bond between two brothers.

From ages 10 to 20, Craig Thompson (the author of Blankets) and his little brother Phil, toiled in Wisconsin farms. Weeding and harvesting ginseng—an exotic medicinal herb that fetched huge profits in China—and funded Craig’s youthful obsession with comic books. Comics in turn, allowed him to escape his rural, working class trappings.

Working in the fields and loyal to the family.

This new book is the result of Thompson having worked in serial form, creating a bimonthly comic book series, the first time he’s done this in his career. Ginseng Roots is part memoir, part travelogue, part essay and all comic book. In this conversation, we chat about the book, and life as a cartoonist, from as many angles as possible.

Panax Ginseng dating back 3,000 years.

Henry Chamberlain: Craig, would you kick things off with an elevator pitch for folks who are new to Ginseng Roots?

Craig Thompson: Sure. This is my new book. It is half memoir and it is half documentary. When I was a little kid, starting when I was 10 years-old, during my summer vacations, I would get up at the crack of dawn, and load up in the car with my little brother and mother. We’re driving on gravel roads and muddy fields, in the middle of nowhere, in rural Wisconsin, to giant ginseng gardens. Ginseng is a medicinal herb prized in Chinese medicine. We worked eight hour days and forty hour weeks, throughout the summer, weeding this delicate medicinal plant.

It was the first job of my life. It spanned from age 10 to 20. When I started, I was being paid one dollar an hour, which translated to one comic book an hour. So, it was ginseng that first fueled my obsession with comic books and kind of led me to where I am today.

This book is about myself and my childhood but also about that herb and all those labyrinthian tangles that it weaves around the world.

Considering your other long-form work, what can you tell us about how you built up your new book?

So, this is the first project that I serialized in comic book form. A 32-page, twelve issue series through Uncivilized Books, based out of Minneapolis, the amazing cartoonist Tom Kacyniski’s publishing house. At this point in my career, this was the first time that I’d worked in the comic book format unless you count mini-comics and zines. That was my introduction to everything: going to Kinko’s and photocopying and hand-stapling my own zines. So, I sort of had missed out on the whole ’90s indie comics thing. I serialized the book first as twelve issues. But the book and the series are different beasts because, once I finished the series, it was missing some key components, some glue to hold it together, to help me transform it into a book. It went through an overhaul: I added some 70 new pages. I moved the order of things around a bit.

The final Pantheon edition, this new book, is twelve chapters. As you say, there are things you have refined or expanded on.

Yes, for example, the series has twelve issues and the book has twelve chapters but the ninth chapter in the new book does not exist in the series. That one focuses a lot of my personal health crisis–it was part of the glue that was needed to hold the whole book together: to be vulnerable about my own health and how ginseng related to that too.

How did it feel returning to the subject of childhood and growing up, which you covered so beautifully in Blankets–what did it feel like to go back to that in Ginseng Roots?

Quite different. Because of my age. When I started Blankets, I was 23 years-old. I worked on that book from ages 23 to 27. I was only about five years away from the events that took place in the book. So, it was pretty raw and I was still a kid. I was still living those experiences and trauma.

Now, I’m turning 50 and I’m the age my parents were when Blankets was published. So, it’s definitely a mid-life sort of perspective that I have now. The dynamic with my parents has shifted. They are in a much more vulnerable position than they were back then. It’s now a more nuanced and empathetic view that I have of my parents. It’s a whole different view of my childhood. I grew up in rural Wisconsin and I hated growing up there and always wanted to get as far away from there as possible from this suffocating small town, this rural farming community. That led me to the West Coast and Portland, one of the most liberal cities in America, with its artistic circles.

Ginseng Roots was an opportunity to go back to where I grew up and to reconcile a lot of things. And to feel differently about that place that I grew up in discomfort as a child.

Ginseng Baptism.

I picked up on that. You are more tolerant about certain things. There are layers of wisdom as we get older. As we go through the book, I’m on a page where you daydream about what it might be like to live the life of a cartoonist. Maybe, someday, you too can be Bob Hope or Jack Lemmon, in silk pajamas at the cartoonist drafting table.

Yeah, growing up working class, you know. My dad was a plumber. And everyone around me were either farmers, truck drivers, carpenters or electricians. I didn’t know adults who had university educations. It wasn’t my class. My first job was outdoors, working an agriculture job, dealing with all the elements of the outdoors and all the discomforts. Besides the fact that I loved comics, working as a cartoonist sure did seem like a very cushy lifestyle, hiding from all the physical elements of weather and get to make-believe and draw.

Younger people can totally relate to wishing for their lives to just get on with it. Older people can relate to looking back at the good things. Maybe someone learned how to fish or paddle a canoe because of a parent.

Yeah, now I miss being outside. Maybe it seemed like a bad thing as a kid but, after twenty-five years creating graphic novels, it sounds nice to get out of the house a bit more often. And this book brought me out of the house. It wasn’t something just created from my imagination. It was documentary work so I had to get out in the field. And interview people. I interviewed nearly 80 people for the project. Generally, any dialogue in a word balloon is from some recorded conversation I had with someone I interviewed.

You do this so smoothly. You just do it. In the spirit of the best comics journalism, like Joe Sacco.

My biggest inspiration of all is Joe Sacco. Certainly for this project since I wanted to deliberately work in comics journalism. Also, thinking more broadly. Joe is a friend of mine, full disclosure. You know, he’s a mentor, a great role model or artists. I always wanted to do comics journalism like he does but I don’t have his background, or his intellect. I don’t know if I quite have that sense of adventure that Joe has, going to war zones and whatnot and being embedded in places of conflict.

But then with my book, I had this very organic subject matter that was kind of unique to me and so I had my entry point. I had wanted to write a book about plants. That’s sort of my tagline. I was really influenced by Michael Pollan, the food and plant writer. He’s known for The Omnivore’s Dilemma and How to Change Your Mind. The book that really influenced me is The Botany of Desire, and it’s about four plants that shaped human civilization as much as we manipulated them as a species. After that, I really wanted to do a book about plants. Again, I’m not a botanist, I don’t have that background like Michael Pollan. And so I just meditated on what I knew and ginseng surfaced right away. I started researching and I knew there was a lot to work with.

One thing I wanted to emphasize to readers of my review of your book is what prose novels and graphic novels have in common. Each begins as something small and then mushrooms into something much bigger as you add to it. I’ve done my fair share of graphic narratives and I know that once you have a compelling subject, you find yourself having to read this or that book. It just keeps growing.

Sometimes I’d read an entire book just to inform one panel. There are certain chapters that are a little more dense; and some areas that I didn’t know at all. I’d have to get through a pile of books just to write that one 32-page chapter.

This is a monumental book, on the same scale with Blankets and Habibi. Can you share with something about the freedom that you have when you have such a big canvas to work on?

I guess I’ve always tended towards this longer format. Blankets was 580 pages, at a time when that was pretty novel, so to speak. I like books that are fully immersive, you just kind of get lost in them, get disoriented, have this opportunity to sort of wander labrynthian routes and work you way back to the main narrative. In the case of this book, I serialized it first. The twelve issues was arbitrary, it just seemed like the right amount for the series. I liked the numerology. I work from an outline and then I focused on one issue at a time. I’d write, pencil, ink it and color it–and publish it–before really digging into the next section. Each issue was self-contained when I was putting it out as a series. The goal was to have each issue stand alone along with having the momentum to have the reader want to seek out the next issue but not like cliffhangers.

I was thinking about how to get a handle on the book and I thought we could focus on one of the chapters, “Make America Ginseng Great Again.” It’s a very timely chapter. I enjoyed viewing a talk given by Will Hsu, of Hsu’s Ginseng Enterprises, one of the leading growers of ginseng in Wisconsin who you profile in your book. This gives us an opportunity to cover ginseng from many angles.

Yeah, this is Chapter 5 in the book and Issue 9 in the series and it focused on the Hsu family. Paul is the father and Will is the son who took over the family business. Paul Hsu emigrated from Taiwan with a degree in Social Work but ended up becoming a ginseng farmer, and growing the business into a mega-growing operation, partly because they diversified, developing all these other products. They also have strong family connections in Taiwan that provided advantages in trade routes and all kinds of leverage and knowledge that the typical white ginseng business would not have.

Make America Ginseng Great Again!

“Make America Ginseng Great Again” was a tagline that Will Hsu used in 2018. The Hsu family has a lot of political ties. They’ve had ties to the Bush administration, and tangential ties to the Trump administration and local government. They’re a big business and big business ends up tangled with politics. When I traveled in Asia, I was in China, South Korea and Taiwan. In Taiwan, I met with my publisher’s foreign rights agent, Joann Yang, and she talked about what she’d heard about Wisconsin ginseng, and that was connected to the Taiwanese version of Trump, Terry Gou, who has ties with President Trump and they’re both getting involved with Wisconsin ginseng.

Trump and the Rust Belt strategy.

It’s a bit of a convoluted story. So, people are now hearing more about Pres. Trump trying to get more industry and factories in the U.S. Well, he made a deal with Terry Gou, who is the CEO of Foxconn, the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. They employ more people than anyone in China. That’s where iPhones come from, and Xboxes and most of the electronics and they wanted to start a company in Wisconsin and they were able to score the biggest state subsidies in U.S. history, something like 4 billion dollars. They were going to bring all these jobs to the area and none of that quite materialized. They have only about a tenth of the staff they have promised. Back to the ginseng, Gou teamed up with the Hsu family to develop a high-end version of ginseng products. So, a lot of the business and science behind all of this is covered in this chapter. A lot of the future of ginseng focuses on breaking down the compounds of ginseng, and synthesizing it for pharmaceuticals.

What can you tell us about misconceptions that the general public has about ginseng?

There’s a lot. Either people have never heard of it or don’t know what it is. Often, people will call it, “ginger roots,” since they’re familiar with ginger, which is also a medicinal root. People will also associate it with these power energy drinks that you might get at a gas station. Those are derived from Asian ginseng which is a stimulant, like caffeine. American ginseng has the opposite properties. It is more of a cooling adaptogenic herb which is better for long-term use for overall health. It’s the American ginseng that is more prized in Asia.

Working on your comics and loyal to your dreams.

You begin your book talking about your love for comics. Could you share with us a bit more about what it is that attracts you to the comics medium?

I’m like a lot of people, more of a visual learner, visually oriented. Unlike other content, like film, video games, other digital content, it just washes over you, bombards you, is moving over you. Comics is much more intimate, something a reader can take in at their own pace. I love prose but it has a sort of arms-length technology of being typeset. So, you’re looking at a font that has been typed. Whereas with comics, you’re actually seeing the handwriting of the author. There’s a great intimacy in that. You’re seeing the handwriting in the lettering and in the drawing itself. I’ve always been into the calligraphy of cartooning. And the sort of strange time travel of comics: you can exist in different times on the same page. I don’t know of any other medium that can do that so effortlessly. It takes skills for us as readers of comics. It’s also something we’re sort of indoctrinated with and so we know how to read them. Once you do, there’s a lot of potential.

It becomes intoxicating!

Yes! I love that!

It’s happening instantaneously and simultaneously. You look in every direction and something is happening.

I just got back from several months of touring in Europe. The A.I. question always comes up. If I feel threatened by A.I., my general response to that is: while I think all jobs are threatened and even human life could be threatened, I don’t think that comics is specifically threatened. I think because A.I. can do a lot of things “better” than humans, the things that people will value more in the arts is the humanity, the fragility, the flaws, the vulnerability. That’s why I like paper and ink. Because it can transmit those things. I don’t want to draw digitally because of the perfection and the cleanness of the line. I want to see the humanity in the line. I think that’s going to become more common. As A.I. takes over all of illustration and the images we see, we’re going to be seeking out images feel more human in their flaws.

I don’t see A.I. replacing you or Kate Beaton or any other cartoonist. For one thing, comics is too idiosyncratic. Where I see A.I. having clearly taken over is hyper-realistic illustration. Basically, A.I. is regurgitating human content–spewing out generic results.

A.I. will just make it easier to get generic but the more personal content will require humans.

Let’s talk about hand-lettering. You still do all your own hand-drawn lettering, right?

Yes. It’s all hand-drawn.

I hesitated to ask since I felt I knew that. It’s something that always comes up, the pros and cons of hand-drawn and using a font. If you’re an auteur cartoonist, you do everything, including the lettering–and it’s hand-drawn. There’s no getting around the fact that hand-drawn lettering is part of the art.

Yeah, I like it being embedded in the art. It might make it more difficult to work on the foreign editions. But, for those, we have a font. There’s a digital font created from my hand-lettering for the foreign editions. I want the lettering to be on the page. I start with the word balloons first to see how many words I can fit. I want the balloons to be kind of minimal, not too dense and wordy. I use a sort of felt tip pen that’s archival, a Micron, which is loose enough to keep the character of my handwriting. It’s not as stiff as using a more traditional tool to slowly letter. I want to retain the looseness of my hand-lettering.

As I get older, I keep looking at other options. I prefer using a Speedball. It does have that resistance but, if you like it, then you can’t help but want to use it. And, if you prefer a Micron, then you use that. One person once told me that it’s no use overthinking it. And I’ve concluded that you’re best served by using what keeps you wanting to draw, what keeps you productive.

That’s great advice. I agree with that for sure. Although, I do admire you for using the more traditional Speedball style. I was never patient enough. And, I guess if it takes a bit longer, it’s giving you more time to think about how the words fit in the balloon and other decisions on the page so there’s a benefit to slowing things down.

It’s going to be a tough nut to crack. I tell folks that it’s going to be time-consuming not matter what you do. It’s going to take time whether it’s all analog or digital so pick whatever method works best for you.

Yeah. Agreed. That’s solid advice.

I have a high concept question for you. Looking at the issues that you cover in your new book, what do you think it will take for better economic outcomes for folks in rural areas?

Wow, that’s a great and broad question. In my hometown, population 1,200 people, this town that I’d found suffocating as a child, now I have a nostalgia for it because it was all these home-grown businesses. The grocery store, the diners, the general store and the pharmacy that had the spinner rack where we bought our comics–all of those were local businesses owned by families in town. And now all of those have been gutted. There’s no real businesses there except for just on the outskirts of town and that’s only corporate things like MacDonald’s. It makes me very sad to see the loss of all those local businesses.

And the ginseng industry has dried up, even in the course of working on this project. Part of that is due to climate change. The growing region has started nudging north–and I saw that happen in the span of the six years I was working on this project. The gardens migrated north because it was too warm to grow south of my parent’s house.

As a kid, I felt my hometown was sheltered from everything else going on culturally. I have some fondness for that reality now. Because, now, everybody is online–so culture has become pretty homogeneous and global. Instagram has made interior design generic for wherever you go in the world.

I was just in a cafe the other day in Portland and we were commenting on how all cafes look exactly the same now. We’ve been spoon-fed this specific aesthetic via Instagram algorithms. Whether you’re in Portland, Iowa City,  Barcelona or Beijing, all the cafes look exactly the same. I miss the strange cultural isolation of where I grew up now.

One of my favorite things in life, for many years, has been spending time in coffee shops in Seattle. I’ll just mildly correct you in saying that Seattle still has its fare share of independent coffee shops, in all its neighborhoods, and they can all be a bit different, have some well-worn homey/comfy vibe to them.

Maybe Seattle has managed to keep the integrity of that. Portland use to be like that too but I wouldn’t say that about Portland now. They all look the same: that minimalist inoffensive hipster style.

The minimalist style you see world-wide, for sure. All tones of gray and beige.

Yes! Beige! The neutral, muted and inoffensive tones of gray and beige. Of course, as we scroll through the book, we’re seeing gray and beige tones too! Everything in the book is made up of just two inks, a black and a red ink–and then gradations of those colors to get a whole palette of sepia tones. I really nerded out of the process, you know, trying to add just the right amount of red to this gray to get this earth tone.

Did you end up tweaking things in Photoshop to any great extent?

Yes. So, everything is drawn on paper with ink, the line art. A lot of the second color I would use bond paper that I would lay over the line art. So, tracing paper for that second color. Then it’s all scanned and composited in Photoshop. To get separate tones, that’s all Photoshop manipulation of many layers of reds and grays.

Speaking of digital vs. analog, Photoshop has been around forever so it has a cred all its own.

I last real job, before becoming a cartoonist, was being a graphic designer back in the ’90s. My first graphic design job was at a newspaper, around 1995.  And in 1996, I was at a small town advertising agency. In 1998, I joined Dark Horse Comics as a graphic designer. So, I came from that background of production. Before I was doing comics or illustration, I was helping out Top Shelf with book design, production work. My ’90s training in Photoshop has been what’s carried me through my whole career.

A lot of people would envy your skill set. I mean, with such an intimate knowledge of Photoshop. The new generation seems to be relying more on Procreate and perhaps not being quite as familiar with Photoshop.

What I’m grateful for is having been around, in the ’90s, when there was still so much paste-up and analog work being done. I still think of making a color page as more like making a screenprint: thinking about trapping, how the colors print out on the plates. There was a printing press in the building so you need see each plate. You would see the cyan, magenta, yellow and black plates printed. How things would come alive.

When I try to tinker with something like Procreate on the iPad, I think it defaults to RGB since most people are using it for online stuff. Right away, that’s jarring to me. I’m so trained in CMYK, the way things are printed. Old school print technology is an obsession of mine. Maybe not on the level of someone like Jordan Crane. He’s the excerpt of those things but we’re of that generation.

Ginseng Baptism.

What we’re looking at now, a page about the ginseng baptism, speaks to the attention to detail, the beauty on the page, you’re talking about. Any final thoughts on what people can expect from this Pantheon edition of your book?

The book comes out at the end of the month, on April 29th. There’s around 70 additional pages since the series. I changed things around. I changed the beginning. I changed the end. And I added a lot in the middle. The series has its own unique features, art created by my brother and an old-fashioned letters page in each issue. The book is a hardcover edition, 448 pages. When I sat down and read all twelve of the original comic book issues, I felt it wasn’t cohesive enough. So, it went through quite an overhaul.

Let me ask you one last question as we close out. How do you tackle a visual metaphor? Maybe how you used the ginseng root?

Every new project starts with a visual metaphor, or symbol or scene. It’s hard to know how I break it down. That’s one of the unique strengths of comics, that you can illustrate ideas visually with metaphors. It just sort of happens organically. I think my religious instruction also informs that. Because Jesus’ teachings were all in parables and they’re all a little bit abstract and so you have to decipher the meaning from them. Some cartoonist are far better than I at working the magic of having the words say one thing and the images they another and from that dissonance a whole other meaning emerges.

As for the ginseng root, I was drawn to the physicality of a plant root. But it was also the perfect metaphor for this process that I needed to engage in of going back to where I came from: tilling through that soil, the aeration of that soil. One thing that is confounding and disturbing about ginseng is that it can never be grown on the same plot of land more than once. You can imagine how frustrating that is for farmers. And we are running out of land for growing in places like Wisconsin. A hundred years can go by and you still wouldn’t be able to grow ginseng in the same soil and that has to do with ginseng depositing a form of toxin in the soil particular to the plant. So, on a personal level, as an author, best known for a memoir, Blankets, I was very wary of that fact. If you have a plant that won’t grow again in the same soil, is it dangerous for me to go back to Wisconsin, revisiting memoir, and try to plant there again which is what I did with this project.

Wow. Well, that’s a perfect place to end it. Thank you so much, Craig.

Than you, Henry.

5 Comments

Filed under Comics, Interviews

Ivan Brunetti’s Graphic Fiction essay

The first volume.

The sequel!

The Ultimate Comics Anthology: A Deep Dive into Ivan Brunetti’s Graphic Fiction

Guest Blog by Jonathan Sandler, Editor of graphicmemoir.co.uk and Author of The English GI: WWII Graphic Memoir

A few weeks ago, I was speaking with Comics Grinder’s Henry Chamberlain about comic anthologies. I told him about Ivan Brunetti’s An Anthology of Graphic Fiction, Cartoons, and True Stories (Volumes 1 & 2), published in 2006 and 2008 by Yale University Press. When I described the books to him, he remarked that they sounded like an encyclopedia—an apt description, though they are perhaps a hybrid of anthology and reference guide. Given the intrigue, he asked me to write a review piece for his blog.

Over the weekend, I picked up both volumes and began rereading them. These books now have a permanent place in my lounge, perfect for dipping in and out whenever time allows, especially between other books. I’m grateful to Chamberlain for prompting me to revisit them.

One of the highlights of both volumes is the collection of essays. Volume 1 includes a written reflection by Charles Schulz on the art of the comic strip, along with graphic essays and tributes scattered throughout. Volume 2 features an essay on Harvey Kurtzman by Adam Gopnik, as well as tribute comic essays by Robert Crumb and Art Spiegelman. My only criticism is that I would have loved more essays—Daniel Raeburn’s piece on Daniel Clowes’s short story Gynecology is another standout, but more analytical content would have been welcome.

Prior to the first volume, Brunetti curated The Cartoonist’s Eye, an exhibit of 75 artists’ work, for the A+D Gallery of Columbia College Chicago. Given his expertise in comics, the task must have been immense. His prologue, though brief, offers valuable insights. He describes comics as a “peculiar art form” and cites Chris Ware’s description of cartooning as “the convergence of seeing and reading” and Spiegelman’s characterization of comics as “writing with pictures.” Brunetti firmly believes that doodling is the fundamental essence of cartooning.

Notably, the anthology is deliberately unstructured—Brunetti eschewed chronology and explanations, preferring the cartoons to speak for themselves. He even apologizes for the title Graphic Fiction, acknowledging that it serves as an umbrella term for memoir, essay, fiction, nonfiction, autobiography, and journalism.

The selections span a wide range, from excerpts of 10–12 pages to single-page works. Many are drawn from serialized pieces, and I realized I already owned several of the featured classics: Maus, Black Hole, Clyde Fans, Berlin, and Building Stories. Seeing Richard McGuire’s Here in its original form was particularly exciting.

Some notable works include:

  • Riot of the Insane by George Grosz (1915)
  • Nancy by Ernie Bushmiller

Personal favorites from the collection:

  • Jack London by Jessica Abel
  • An untitled work by Ivan Brunetti (page 87 of Volume 1)
  • Cheap Novelties by Ben Katchor
  • Griffith’s Observatory by Bill Griffith
  • Hawaiian Getaway by Adrian Tomine
  • Patton and A History of America by Crumb
  • How I Quit Collecting Records by Robert Crumb & Harvey Pekar
  • Is There Life After Levittown? (from Lemme Outta Here!, 1978)
  • The Ethel Catherwood Story by David Collier

While writing this article, I watched Married to Comics, the documentary about Justin Green and Carol Tyler. It featured Green’s groundbreaking work Binky Brown Meets the Holy Virgin Mary—a piece I had never read but immediately wanted to. I thought to myself, I’m sure this is in Brunetti’s anthology—and of course, it was, which only underscores the lasting value of these volumes. Phoebe Gloeckner was also interviewed in the documentary, which piqued my interest in her work. I was then able to dip into an excerpt from Diary of a Teenage Girl included in the anthology. There’s always something more to discover, even years later. That’s the magic of a truly great collection.

Other contributors include David Mazzucchelli, Lynda Barry, Gary Panter, Gilbert & Jaime Hernandez, and more. In fact, there are too many to mention. Of course, not every piece resonated with me, but that’s the point. Some styles didn’t connect, and certain artworks—like King-Cat by John Porcellino and Joe Matt’s work—can be challenging to read due to how much they try to fit onto each page. This reminded me of something Scott McCloud once said: how comics were once constrained by limited space—artists would cram as much as possible onto a page—but now, they have the freedom to stretch out. The key takeaway is that there are so many different ways to draw comics, and this anthology showcases the eclecticism and variety of this wonderful art form.

It’s also worth noting that these volumes are nearly 20 years old. In a 2013 interview with Gil Roth, Brunetti mentioned the proliferation of graphic novelists, noting that he couldn’t keep up. Now 20 years on—as readers, we are spoiled for choice. That said, the works and the artists in these two volumes still stand the test of time.

Other details worth noting: The books were co-edited by Chris Ware and Laura Mizicko. Volume 1’s dust jacket was designed by Seth, while Daniel Clowes provided the cover for Volume 2. The anthologies draw from essential art-house comics publishers, including Fantagraphics, Drawn & Quarterly, Pantheon, Top Shelf, and Smithsonian Collections. Both volumes also feature illustrations by Saul Steinberg.

A few years ago, if someone had asked me about comics, I might have (ignorantly) thought only of superheroes, horror comics, or children’s books. But over time, I’ve immersed myself in the world of art-house comics, particularly those by North American cartoonists. Brunetti’s two volumes of Graphic Fiction are magisterial. Every art-house comics fan should have them on their bookshelf. These aren’t books you read from start to finish—they are books to explore, revisit, and savor over time.

About Ivan Brunetti:
Ivan Brunetti was born in Italy and moved to the South Side of Chicago when he was eight. He is an Associate Professor of Illustration in the Design Department at Columbia College Chicago, where he teaches courses on illustration, cartooning, graphic novels, and visual narrative. He has also taught at the University of Chicago. He is the author of Cartooning: Philosophy and Practice and Aesthetics: A Memoir, as well as the editor of both volumes of An Anthology of Graphic Fiction, Cartoons, and True Stories.

Leave a comment

Filed under Book Reviews, Comics

Pete Hegseth can’t catch a break!

And it came to be known, far and wide, as Signalgate! Look, ma, I’m usin’ me noggin. Enjoy my latest comic. What do you think of Signalgate?

On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe were evasive during a Senate hearing that focused on their roles in the Trump administration’s scandal involving sensitive military information that was inadvertently shared with The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.

Democrats were most apoplectic over Gabbard’s and Ratcliffe’s insistence that no classified information had been shared in the group chat on the Signal app, which Goldberg said had involved “precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing” and had included Gabbard and Ratcliffe, along with Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and national security adviser Mike Waltz.

While Republicans largely avoided the disturbing report in their questioning, Democrats leaped at what was the first opportunity to question Trump officials at length about the scandal. And it was clarifying because it showed Trump officials’ eagerness to evade questions in the face of accountability.

And, if you’re interested in working with me on any form of illustration or related stuff, just drop me a line in the Contact form. You can find some more of my work here.

#politics #comics #illustraton #cartoonist #drawing #satire

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics

Surrealism, Bugs Bunny, and the Blues by Franklin Rosemont book review

Surrealism, Bugs Bunny, and the Blues: Selected Writings on Popular Culture. Franklin Rosemont. Editors Abigail Susik. Paul Buhle. PM Press. 368pp. 2025. $26.95
The art of the essay provides a platform for writers to share their subject and perhaps a bit about their worldview. We read essays all the time, usually as reviews, mainly on books, movies and music. And there are notable collections such as Pauline Kael’s oeuvre. A writer who likes to write such essays tends to like a lot of things and Franklin Rosemont (1943-2009) was no exception. Rosemont was passionate about the masses, mass media and how it all interconnected. In this collection, the reader is swept up by Rosemont’s thoughts and vivid writing on the inclusive power of entertainment, particularly, cinema, comics, Surrealism, and popular music.
Beginning in the 1960s, and for the next thirty some years, Rosemont wrote and edited for progressive magazines, the two main ones being Cultural Correspondence (1975-1983) and Radical America (1967-1999). It seems only natural that Rosemont made connections with the Left, especially the Labor movement, and the democratic nature of mass entertainment. Anyone is free to enjoy it, to contribute to it, to be transformed by it. As I read one essay after another, I was moved by the cumulative effect of Rosemont’s arguments, his deep belief that everyone has a place at the cultural table.

“The Dream That Came True,” by Dust Wallin, One Big Union Monthly, May 1920.

 

Mad Magazine, May 1, 1954. Basil Wolverton. As subversive as he needed to be.

The more I read, the more I gave myself over to the people power theme in these essays. It certainly fits in well with Rosemont’s writing on cartoonists for Wobbly newspapers, like Industrial Worker (1909-1931). But can one be certain that Basil Wolverton (Mad Magazine, 1950s) was so closely aligned with the proletariat, as Rosemont seems to imply in another essay? Well, maybe so but you just never know for sure. The greatest satirists will leave you wondering which side they’re on, if any. Of course, one can argue that anything unusual in the 1950s potentially carried subtext. It is a different case with the Surrealist movement which, beginning with its founder, Andre Breton, made clear it was indeed an anti-fascist movement. It’s interesting to consider Surrealism’s history, starting in 1924 and into the 1950s. What began as an art and political movement, in response to the aftermath of World War I, was constantly pushing against authority. In this context, it is not surprising to bring in the subject of anarchists. One of Rosemont’s most insightful essays discusses how the anarchist political and philosophical movement, focused on the viability of stateless societies, came to be maligned in the United States and caricatured as bomb-toting terrorists.
It’s the 1920s, the era of silent movies, where I will conclude my review. If we are looking for connective tissue to Rosemont’s writings, we need look no further than dreams. It is in the land of dreams, after all, that we can all indulge our most subversive desires. We can all return to our youthful ambitions of leading the charge in the subculture! It is the world of silent movies, with its play of light and shadow and uncanny expression that we enter a netherworld closely aligned with our own private slumberland. In this world, such figures as Buster Keaton, the Great Stone Face, reign supreme. No wonder such a world would utterly fascinate Rosemont and lead to some of his most compelling writing. Here is an excerpt:
These two films (Sherlock Jr., 1924; Cameraman, 1928) best exemplify Keaton’s revolutionary/poetic worldview. When he passes through the looking-glass, he is not content merely to see what is on the other side: he braves his way through a whole succession of looking-glasses, each behind the other, and each reflecting only the meagerest hint of what we call “the real.” And what motive could possibly underlie such feverish wanderings back and forth through the interpenetrating spheres of the pluriverse? The answer is crystal clear: Keaton’s audacity is in the service of sublime love. His agility is always radiant with a lover’s grim determination. There is no risk that he will not take for the woman he loves. Only Buster Keaton, moreover, can sustain a single kiss for two years (The Paleface, 1921).
We can always return back to Keaton, with that iconic poker face, champion of subversion but always leaving you to wonder as to what side he’s on, if any. When I simply consider Keaton’s artistic considerations, I feel confident he was seeking a more universal tone with whatever he did. Let his movies speak for him, he would say. Ah, there’s that one scene with Keaton (Cops, 1922) when he takes a bomb, by then popularly accepted as the symbol for the anarchist or, more plainly, widespread mayhem, uses it to light his cigarette, and then throws it back to the police. A great political statement? Hmm, how about just a funny visual prank? The Great Stone Face would never tell.
Like any great collection of essays, there is something for everyone in this book. Give yourself over to the vast array of subjects discussed here, and you’ll be the richer for it. I can imagine Rosemont going from one cultural signpost after another and reaching his own conclusions such as embracing Bugs Bunny as a folk hero for the masses. Well, more than fair enough. And he takes it one step further and implicates Elmer Fudd. Again, more than fair enough, as well as relevant for today. Yes, be wary of the Elmer Fudds of the world, those who only think in terms of transactions. The Fudds of the world are the conformists and the sell-outs. But, with will and determination, the Bugs Bunnies of the world will prevail!

1 Comment

Filed under Book Reviews, Essays, pop culture

Anders Nilsen Interview on TONGUES and the Art of Comics

Anders Nilsen is on a quest as a comics artist to deliver his vision as well as he can to the reader. That’s saying a lot when it comes to Nilsen as anyone who is familiar with his work can attest. The new collection of his work is Tongues, Volume 1, published by Pantheon Books, a division of Penguin Random House, pub date is Mar 11, 2025  and you can pre-order. My review here. Once you enter this book, from the first page onward, you are transported to a sort of netherworld that leads you from one realm to the next, the worlds of gods and humans. Questions regarding existence and divinity are asked and answered as a common exchange.
We ran into a bit of technical difficulty and naturally opted to pursue an email interview. Basically, this is one of those interviews that allows for so much latitude in regards to approach given all the material that can potentially be covered. For this one, I thought it might make sense to do a bit of comparison between the two big books in Nilsen’s career with greatest overlap. And so we came up with what could have been over an hour of chat, perhaps over a couple of cups of coffee, distilled down to what you read below. I don’t take anything for granted and I’m very grateful for the time and care involved in Anders’s thoughtful responses.

Page excerpt from Tongues.

HENRY CHAMBERLAIN: Thank you, Anders, for doing this interview. I can only imagine things remain chaotic, one way or another, for everyone in Los Angeles.
ANDERS NILSEN: Yeah, it’s been a weird time. My wife and I did actually evacuate briefly. We lost power and internet on the second day of the fires, and then a new blaze popped up that evening in the Hollywood Hills, which is only a couple of miles away from us. So we went to stay with a friend in the far south end of the city for three nights until the power came on again. In the grand scheme of things it was a small disruption, but it’s definitely a weird feeling to have to decide in an hour or two what stuff you value most in the world. And our cats were very grumpy about it.

Page excerpt from Big Questions.

At the time of this interview, we’re about a month before the release of Tongues, Volume 1 (03/11/2024). Looking back at the time of the release of your other work of comparable size and scope, the collected Big Questions (08/16/11), how would you compare these two milestones in your career?
They are very different moments for me. Big Questions wasn’t the first book I published, but it was the project that got me started being serious about making comics, and I think of it as being my, like, 12 year graduate school in comics. That’s how I learned how the medium worked, basically, and how I figured out how I wanted to approach it. You can see it in the book itself – the early pages are sort of roughly drawn – partly on purpose, but not entirely. I was figuring things out as I went. Tongues on the other hand felt like “okay, now I know what I’m doing, more or less, here’s a chance to start out with something like command of my medium. I’ve still learned a ton working on this book, but I was a much more capable artist from the start of it.
Tongues is also a culmination for me. Every other book I’ve done has grown out of small experiments and messing around in my sketchbooks. Tongues didn’t. It grew out of those other finished works. There’s a way in which it feels like everything I’ve done in comics to this point has led me to this project. Everything has built up to this. So that’s also very different.

Poor Prometheus.

Prometheus is a titan in Greek mythology who commited the sin of helping (or creating) humanity with the gift of fire (knowledge). This provides a jumping off point for Tongues as you have a Prometheus story that continues and branches off from the original. You explicitly have humanity gain the gift of language; and you have a Prometheus moving beyond his imprisonment from the gods. Would you share with us a bit about how you play and interact with the story of Prometheus?
Sure. I love that story. I know the basic version from reading that mythology as a kid, pouring over it. So the basic outline is sort of burned into my head. I did a short story several years back (in Rage of Poseidon) playing with the idea of his ‘eternal’ punishment extending into the present, as it reasonably would. And it touched on his relationship with the eagle that is sent every day to eat his liver. The eagle is his tormentor, but it’s also his only friend, the only other mind he interacts with. And in my work birds usually talk. So I was interested in that relationship. What would it be like? What a weird tension, right? Full of possibilities. And his traditional role as creator of humanity also allows me to get into human nature and evolution which I have a longstanding interest in. And then when I actually read more deeply, Prometheus’ story only got more interesting. Our basic conception of the story comes from the playwright Aeschylus in 480 BCE (or thereabouts). But his play, Prometheus Bound is only one of a trilogy – the other two are lost, we don’t even know if Prometheus Bound is the first or the last in the series. They are very sketchily understood from other contemporary writing, but again, what a great sandbox to get to play in, and to get to fill in the blanks with my own bastardized version. And then, lastly, there’s a tension with Zeus, the king of the gods, who arranges the punishment. Prometheus literally translates as “forethought” – he can see into the future, at least some parts of it. And so he knows which of Zeus’s offspring will come to overthrow him, and when – as happened to his father and grandfather before him. But he hates Zeus, and refuses to tell him, despite being tortured for eternity. So… yeah. Great material to muck around with.
If I tried to give a brief explanation/comparison of Big Questions (658 pages) and Tongues (368 pages), I would say that one book has the creatures of the gods looking up, trying to make sense of the gods; and the latter book has the gods looking down, trying to make sense of the creatures. Did things just work out that way or do you think your ongoing storytelling was leading in that direction?
Wow, that’s great, I actually hadn’t thought about that inversion in that way, but yes, that completely makes sense. Although in a way in Tongues, by the present, the humans have, in a way, surpassed the gods. Though only in a way. But yes, I think both books are trying to play with, to conceptualize a relationship to divinity, to the universe, to the very strange fact of being alive in the world. And it only makes sense to come at it from both directions, eventually. And I guess in Tongues, one of my favorite characters is the Eagle. And she’s trying to understand both.
Of course, Tongues has been brewing and evolving, in one form or another, over many years, back to, in small part, Dogs and Water (2005) and, more explicitly in Rage of Poseidon (2013). Would you share with us a bit on the building blocks that you were working with back then and how they proved to be part of something bigger?
The connection with Dogs and Water is a good story. So D+W was my first published book, and out of everything I’ve done, for some reason it has had the most random interest in the film rights. For several years after it was published I would get random emails from rock stars or people in film about turning it into a movie. Usually it would be one or two emails and then they would disappear and the idea wouldn’t go anywhere. But in 2009 or so a Canadian production company got in touch and it got far enough that I agreed to write a script for a feature. The book is honestly not that substantial, so it involved adding some new material. There’s one scene in the book where the main character, a young man with a teddy bear strapped to his back, lost in the middle of nowhere, is passed on the road by a sort of military caravan. These Canadian filmmakers suggested expanding that scene, maybe having one truck stop and having some sort of interaction. Which I was interested in. So I wrote that scene into the script. Well, the movie went nowhere, but that scene stuck in my head. I really liked it. And disliked that it would never see the light of day. So years later when I was beginning to think about a new long-form graphic novel I decided to incorporate that scene. It’s the first thing in Tongues that I actually drew. It’s funny, though, it’s the same character, but in a sort of alternate world. And the bear on his back is not the same bear. 
Part of assembling the elements of Tongues was very much a process of throwing obstacles down in my path to just see what would happen. I was specifically interested in dumping this D+W thing in with Prometheus, and human nature and the tensions of the middle east, etc etc. They didn’t really make sense together, but it felt like something interesting might arise out of that tension.
Incidentally a short film was eventually made from the final quarter or so of Dogs and Water by a director named Randy Krallman. But again, basically no one has ever seen it. It’s beautifully shot. But will probably never be seen, sadly.
Reading Tongues is such a pleasure. It is an understatement to say that it brings together all of your strengths in comics art. Looking over pages, I want to point out a few like the two-page spread (p116-117) which depicts Astrid and her father walking around the mall and engaged in a very serious conversation. Recently, I stumbled upon the comics term, the De Luca Effect. Is that familiar to you? I’ve discovered that some of the greatest cartoonists using this technique are not familiar with the term. Basically, it’s a way to have one (or more) characters inhabiting different moments in the same space. My guess is that this is simply something that emerged during your process. In fact, your use of it includes “panels,” which technically would not be used in this technique. All very theoretical stuff!
Oh, that’s cool, no I don’t think I’ve ever heard that term before. But I love doing that in certain places. It feels like it breaks up time in a slightly different way than normal panelling. Slows it down, or makes it slightly quieter, or more meditative, potentially. Although I’ve probably used it in other, more kinetic ways, too.
That brings me to your own very distinctive use of panels. Heck, I would call them the Nilsen Effect! Would you share with us a bit about your use of polygons and the like?
Sure, yeah, panelling was something I was very much interested in playing with in Tongues. I’m interested in panels in comics as ‘frames of experience’. So, like, the structure and arrangement of panels influences the way a reader reads a scene. And how the scene feels This is obvious in a way, but it’s not really exploited that much. Regular squares or rectangles are an easy way to break up action, but they also have an effect on the reader. In Big Questions I found that regular, repetition of evenly spaced square panels helped create a regular rhythm which was useful for, say, conversations between two birds, where there wasn’t a lot of action. They were great for that. In D+W I did the whole book without any panel borders. And that had a very different, very particular effect on the feel of the story. It emphasized the open blankness of that landscape, and it had an effect of making it feel (I think) a little less like your focus was being dictated by the author. It felt more open. For Tongues I wanted to try some other stuff. In particular I wanted it to feel like the structure of each page was almost an object unto itself. And to echo the unfolding feel of the ‘magic cube’ in the story. This becomes more explicitly about the structure of reality when Astrid has her ‘audience’ in the underground pit and the dream/hallucination that follows. And then there’s the Prisoner’s Dream sequence at the beginning of the book. One reviewer described it as the ritual reading of entrails. Which I love. I hadn’t thought of that, but I wanted it to feel like a kind of magical ritual state. And also like a dream. The framing of panels with animal forms, or the plant forms of Prometheus’ ‘garden’ feels to me a little like framing lyrics with music in a song. It’s a literal marrying of two different sides of the brain in that context. Which automatically is going to deepen things and give it texture and tone and weirdness. It’s a tool.
If you will bear with me, I also wanted to point out the fascinating progression of your comics art in Big Questions. You reach a point, where you start to make use of the two-page spread and never look back. I hope that makes sense. I’m just saying that, at some point in your evolving as a comics artist, you saw the full potential of the two-page canvas and made it your own. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.
That’s cool, yeah, I like to throw in a good two-page spread now and then. I feel like I should be more conscious than I am of the spread as a unit, rather than the single page. Because that is the visual whole that the reader encounters when they turna page, really. But it’s also good to be able to have the two-page spreads break up the rhythm of the sequence of pages. To establish rhythms and then occasionally break them. Just one more thing to play with.
Also, it appears that you made use of an original page size format that was about twice or less bigger than the printed page. Your originals are (or were) on 11″x14″ bristol. Do you still use that size or have you bumped up to something bigger? I noticed that, as you evolved, your lettering got a little smaller while the compositions and characters appear to take up more space than can easily accommodate your original page size unless, of course, you simply refined your process.
That’s incredibly perceptive. Yeah, my originals are bigger now. The first issue of Tongues was a little all over the place, but at this point my original pages are 12.5″ x 17″. So about 150% of the printed page. Roughly. Sometimes the page has to get expanded a bit. As for the lettering… don’t look too closely. The size changes a bit here and there. There are some things I could probably be more systematic about. But… maybe some day.
Another process question I must ask is all the production upgrades you made in Tongues, compared with Big Questions. That said, once you catch your stride in Big Questions, the improvement is apparent. Just the inclusion of those amazing geometric patterns alone indicates more and more dazzling art up ahead. And then you take things further with your own distinctive use of color. Not only is it a sophisticated color palette but you push boundaries, as on page 133, daring to have black text rest on such a dark purple background–and still be fully readable. I can only imagine that your own fine arts background compelled you to take on the role of a colorist, and at such a high level of complexity. What can you tell us about your coloring and production work?
Yeah, when I was getting started I had friends ask why I wanted to use color. Like, what’s the point? And… I don’t know, partly I just wanted to do something I hadn’t done before. And I did go to school for painting once upon a time, like you say. And color can convey a lot (obviously). I love doing the color, but it is also a TON of work. I’ve had folks helping out for most of the book, but that can get very expensive. It’s part of the reason I have only been able to do like 50 pages a year. But yes, I love the way I can suggest light and atmosphere, darkness and backlighting. It adds so much. And some of the artists that I admire most have been great colorists. Moebius, Herge, Chris Ware, CF, Sarah Glidden. After Tongues is done I might never do a full-color comic again. But I’m in it for now, more or less happily. 
You have said that you had to make a choice between “artist” and “cartoonist” and you chose the latter. That said, I wonder if you’ve come around to accepting yourself simply as an artist. Whatever the case, your work is extraordinary and you have every right to embrace the role of artist.
Thanks. Yeah, I do think of myself as both. I probably use the words depending on the context and who I’m talking to. Or who I’m trying to get paid by, maybe. I definitely see what I do as wider than just comics, but it’s the comics world that embraced my work early on, and I’m very happy with that label, and being connected to that tradition. But I also think of myself as a storyteller and a book designer and a drawer and… probably a few other things. 
I would add that I understand the hesitancy in calling oneself an artist. I also come from a fine arts background and I also reached a point where I needed to seriously pursue comics. And yet I still love to draw and paint, as I’m sure you do. We are both of a certain vintage where a fine arts major was the only game in town, no comics diplomas, and I think that’s all just fine. Who knows, perhaps younger art students will be secretly creating paintings outside of their comics curriculum! I believe things have sort of come full circle with the comics medium elevated well into the “art-academic complex,” as I sometimes call it.
Yeah, comics had definitely not penetrated academia when I was a student. I had to push upstream a bit to do them. Then when I taught for a couple of years I sometimes wished that my students weren’t quite so focussed on a single medium. And I feel the same way about the publishing industry at times, too, or maybe the market. But the world is what it is, and I’m happy to have found a place in it from which to occasionally push against boundaries.
I will ask just a couple of more questions and please feel free to add anything I might have missed. Essentially, what I get from Tongues is that the gods usually are not concerned with the humans unless the humans make themselves an inconvenience or outright danger. For me, the whole book is operating in this sort of timeless god-time. Of course, the “present time” rears its head, as in the mention of smartphones and social media.
Figuring out how to deal with the passage of deep time has been one of the really fun problems to play with in this book, for sure, specifically Prometheus’ long sleep. There’s definitely a certain suspension of disbelief I am asking of my readers in that regard. Our brains aren’t really built for geologic time, of course, or even the sweep of human history, which is a tiny fraction of it. Its almost a kind of absurdity to try and make a graphic novel about such things. But it’s been fun to try.
I realize that the evolution of the whole Tongues narrative has been years in the making. Are you satisfied with it so far and can see pursuing it further? There are certainly numerous reasons to continue, and at the pace you’ve been going too. That opens a whole discussion on creating work as a series. Basically, it seems the stage is set for you to do whatever works best for you.
Yeah, the story is only half done. Volume 2 is underway. So I’m committed to another few years, at least. Thankfully Pantheon has been very open to me self-publishing the individual issues as I go, which is a huge help. It’s such a lot of work, its good to break the deadlines up.
Lastly, as we embark on this year and beyond, with its many challenges, I find that seeking out the transcendent is a path that will recharge one with clarity and strength for the struggles ahead. If you would like to share any spiritual reflections, please feel free to do so.
Yeah, the next few years are going to be a lot. I don’t know that I have any special wisdom, but I’ve been paying attention to my breathing lately. Which is sometimes tremendously helpful. And I am very lucky to live near Griffith Park in Los Angeles. It’s a big semi-wilderness in the middle of the city. You can lose yourself there and cross paths with coyotes and deer and owls and crows. It’s a gift as far as I’m concerned. It has been a huge positive in my life, creative and otherwise. Watching the changes in light and weather and vegetation between day and night and season to season, feeling the deep quiet of the place… it helps make this insane world bearable for me. It’s finally been raining a bit here lately, after the fires. I’m excited to get to watch the park bloom and turn green again in the next week or so. I was up there last week after a difficult day and spent about 15 minutes watching two crows circle and chase one another in formation, continuously looping and surfing the updrafts. It was so beautiful to watch, and looked like such fun. I’m very grateful I have that.
Thank you!

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Interviews

Kay Sohini interview: New York City and Beyond

Kay Sohini is an artist, writer and researcher. With this debut graphic memoir, This Beautiful, Ridiculous City, published by Ten Speed Graphic, Sohini provides a fun and highly accessible look at New York City from a number of vantage points–and it is even more than that (read my review). In this interview, we unpack as much as possible. Sohini is known for distilling complex subjects through the language of comics, a more precise and concise format that combines image and text. Sohini’s coming-of-age graphic memoir is a delight to read. It evokes an effortless grace but it is actually built upon a very sophisticated framework. Sohini, after all, holds a PhD in English. Her dissertation, focusing on the comics medium, was created as a comic book, her first foray into creating comics. Sohini’s essays and comics have appeared in The Washington Post and The Nib, among other places.

Moving from academic scholarship to general readership. Excerpt from Sohini’s PhD dissertation, Drawing Unbelonging.

You can say that This Beautiful, Ridiculous City is a transition for Sohini from the academic world to the world of general readership. In that regard, the book proves to be a success. The specificity of scholarly pursuits can certainly get bogged down in jargon and navigate within a more narrow viewpoint but readers must find out for themselves. In many cases, there is plenty of common ground to be found. I think the through line in Sohini’s work is a drive toward clarity, a heart-felt desire to share observations and insights. Isn’t that what we hope to find in our best reading experiences, especially in nonfiction?

Our conversation is easygoing. I do my best not to fall into just talking about New York City even though that is at the heart of Sohini’s book. As Sohini states: “This book is about a lot of things. At its core, it’s about literature and being starstruck about New York. But it is also about abuse, inequity and social commentary.” And how appropriate to have New York act as a sort of container for further discussion.

Excerpt from This Beautiful, Ridiculous City.

And so we engage in a good bit of shop talk as well as share a love for the Big Apple. I must say that this love of New York City hits me at my core. I created a graphic novel about New York City many years ago and the sentiments expressed in that work still hold true. I sort of stumbled into creating that work without much of any plan on how to promote it but definitely with a deep desire to bring it to life. And that’s the stuff that dreams are made of. That’s the stuff that fuels one’s love for New York. That’s, no doubt, the stuff that led Sohini to pursue her own love letter to New York City.

Enjoy the video interview and, as always, I welcome your support in the way of comments, views and Likes. I don’t know exactly how we are to resolve the current troubled times we face in detail but it will involve voting. Beyond that, we can do many things out in the community and we can support each other’s good work. With that in mind, I highly recommend that you seek out Sohini’s book which is about a lot of things, most notably at this crisis point, it is about an immigrant’s struggle to achieve the American Dream.

Comments Off on Kay Sohini interview: New York City and Beyond

Filed under Comics, Interviews

This Beautiful Ridiculous City by Kay Sohini book review

This Beautiful Ridiculous City. Kay Sohini. Ten Speed Press. 2025. 128pp. $24.99.

If you are a creative person, you have most likely fallen in love with New York City and perhaps that feeling has stayed with you. In a city with an endless amount of stories to tell, it seems that everyone who dares to dream of an artistic life, and has the means or sheer will to do so, has taken a bite out of the Big Apple. Kay Sohini, a talented artist-writer, presents her take on her own love affair with NYC in her debut graphic memoir, This Beautiful Ridiculous City. The title says it all. This is the city that never sleeps , an amazing amalgam of high and low culture along with manic highs and lows. Everyone has their story to tell about this quintessential metropolis and Sohini provides quite a distinctive visual narrative.

Sohini has a way of inviting the reader into her world that is sincere and authentic. I felt quite at home as Sohini leads the way, setting the tone by sharing about her love for New York: the sights and sounds; the artists and writers; the euphoric feeling of being there. This introduction dovetails into a look back at Sohini’s childhood and upbringing in the suburbs of Calcutta: a slower pace; a smaller scene. I think therein lies the conflict: a need by Sohini to seek greener pastures while also coming to terms with and honoring her family back home once she does leave for New York. It won’t be a spoiler to say that Sohini does ultimately find a balance. What transpires within this delightful book is an utterly genuine coming-of-age story with all the insights and epiphanies any reader could want.

This book is filled with page after page of essential information for anyone interested in visiting New York, or just curious about what makes a great city tick. This is also a compelling story about one young person’s journey of self-discovery. And there are wonderful extended moments when it all seems to coalesce. One such scene is a two-page spread that well represents the soul of the book: a mother and daughter conversation about food. Sohini explains that she was kept out of the kitchen as a child. Now, as an adult, she hungers for every recipe detail she can get from her mother.

Another two-page spread provides a delightful insider guide to the best kept secrets on where to find amazing Indian food but you’ll have to leave Manhattan to find it. In the end, life in the big city is made up of a vast array of struggles, failures and sublime victories. Who is to say just how great a victory a favorite restaurant can provide on any given day? Sohini will help you appreciate New York City with her crisp and thoughtful writing and drawing. This graphic memoir is truly a victory.

3 Comments

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews, Graphic Memoir

Tongues by Anders Nilsen graphic novel review

Tongues. Anders Nilsen. Pantheon. 2025. 368pp. $35.

Among the most anticipated works in comics for 2025, the collected Tongues (368 pages) by Anders Nilsen rises to the top. The other work by Nilsen that is similar in scope and content is the equally mammoth collected Big Questions (658 pages), published by Drawn & Quarterly in 2012. Both books are profoundly philosophical. While Big Questions is, more or less, pared down to focus on the entanglements of a few small creatures, Tongues bring in gods to ponder, and engage in, the fate of humanity. We may feel in our own time that we are at the mercy of the gods and so all the more reason to engage with this monumental work in comics.

Settling into this book, it charms you right from the very first page and I was instantly lost within its rhythms. While based upon three tales from Aeschylus, there is no need to fear any required prior knowledge. In fact, you may know more than you realize. Perhaps Leda and the Swan rings a bell. But, no matter. These are timeless, primal and utterly accessible stories. What does matter is simply allowing yourself to be swept away by Nilsen’s masterful storytelling: smartly-paced narrative inextricably linked to beautifully rendered artwork.

Nothing is quite right in Tongues. It is as if the world has been tilted off its axis just enough to cause recurring imbalance. The bad guys always have the upper hand and yet, as one god concludes, patience is a virtue. That is if you’re willing to wait around for at least a thousand years. Everything is relative. And so it goes as the narrative alternates between human scale and god scale. What is one death in the big scheme of things? And then another and another? One war bleeds into the next. Will a child lead the way? Ah, perhaps nothing so obvious. Again, it all comes back to the mysterious and enigmatic way this story unfolds.

Poor Prometheus.

Anders Nilsen’s career as an artist has been a gradual and steady progression. He first got on people’s radars in 2005 with his long-form comic, Dogs and Water. This was followed in 2007 with his heart-breaking account of the life and death of his partner, Cheryl Weaver, Don’t Go Where I Can’t Follow. Look at the work going back to the early years and you find very simple drawing, even stick figure characters. The first section to his monumental Big Questions has its relatively rough patches with very simple drawings, yet always hinting at deeper sophistication. Today, Nilsen is at the very top, among the best artists working today, whatever the medium, without a doubt.

That brings us back to this latest book and Prometheus with his perpetual patience, sure that one day an eagle will suddenly tire of the daily punishment it has been tasked with of gutting him open and flying away with his liver. Specifically, Zeus punished Prometheus for giving humans the gift of fire. All very profound and fanciful stuff to be sure. Nilsen has an uncanny way of being able to evoke complexity, both human and godly, mired in a thousand contradictions. At his best, Nilsen manages to shed some light on the virtually incomprehensible. The fires raging in California can’t help but, at least for me, come to mind. Profound to the point of unbearable. Nilsen’s creative journey has been one of distilling the greatest pain and finding some artful consolation.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

BALD graphic novel review

The alopecia comic.

Bald.  text by Tereza Cecechova, art by Stepanka Jisbova. Translated from Czech by Martha Kuhlman. University Park: Penn State Press, Graphic Mundi imprint,  2024, $19.95.

Guest review by Paul Buhle

The spread of published graphic novels across the planet is already outperforming the expectations of a couple of decades ago, not to mention the volume of non-printed materials on the web. This volume can only continue, and perhaps marks the presence of a particular bent of a generation armed with skills in software and in need of self-expression.

Generalizations risk anything from mild inaccuracy to total idiocy. But the work of young to early middle age people, 20s to 40s, very often reveals the search for personal meaning. The world is falling apart, the future looks pretty grim, but it is more than possible to evaluate and re-evaluate interchanges of relationships, especially friendship and love. To suggest that women artists have a special interest in these areas is not to draw any firm conclusions but to note how frequently these topics turn up in the lists of bigger comic publishers like Fantagraphics. Adventures, including fantastic adventures that somehow still involve relationships in crucial ways, only reinforce the suggestion.

And then, there’s the medical angle. Comics about youngish people facing all kinds of physical problems, living through extended treatments for cancers in particular, open up comic art to the most intense personal examinations. These days, the details have become available and susceptible to pretty clear explanations. Perhaps the moral here is that people can live through assorted woes, thanks to advanced medical practices. Or perhaps the intensity of environmental stresses, not to mention the sinking job market/living conditions of the young in particular, make the medical angle more intense. “Living With Disease” might just be one of the central experiences of our time.

Bald involves a young woman’s experience and pursuit of strategies. She goes on a camping trip to Iceland with an attentive boyfriend, almost an ideal miniature love saga with fantasies of a future wedding—a story a little too perfect—when she observes that her hair is falling out. Here the narrative takes shape.

Much of the GN takes place in her search to understand the problem and various, posslbe solutions. Nobody quite knows what causes alopecia, loss of hair in part or enitrely, in assorted areas of the body or the entire body. And no one, apparently, understands how it may be cured, although there are many treatments, opening a great opportunity to spend a lot of money and be bitterly disappointed.

That Bald was originally published in the Czech Republic, and that the artist and writer seem to have spent most of their lives in Central Europe, seems to make no difference: they could be anywhere in Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa or in the Americas, without much altering the plot. That the experience of young women in many parts of the world is likely to similar tells us something about the issues of gender in today’s society. They are not being held in place anymore, and they are not overwhelmed by setbacks.

Thus our protagonist and her saga. Her boyfriend/lover is not always in the same geographical spot as her, but remains unformly supportive. He admits the situation will take some getting used to—and this is the closest he approaches anything like rejection. So she must solve the problems of workmates and social occasions.

Perhaps the worst is the casual but reasonable conclusion that a young person and especially a young woman without hair may be receiving chemotherapy for cancer. A certain telegenic, African American congresswoman of Massachusetts with the same ailment, Ayanna Pressley, may actually offer more accurate public perceptions for US audiences in particular. But the stereotype remains, and our heroine need to get past all this.

She is realistically, perceptively drawn trying all kinds of things but especially a variety of wigs, before realizing that the expense is ridiculous and she could use the  money better. She finds her narrative at a storytelling conference, and perhaps the real idea is that we learn in groups, especially learn how to accept ourselves. And this does not apply only to personal life: one of the supportive women’s comic art groups,  Laydees Do, offered her an opportunity to share experience after she attends the conference in Scotland where she gains some invaluable moral support. The artist herself has since helped organize such an artists’ group in Prague.

Bald is not an adventurous adventure. Or perhaps it is, or at least as adventurous as a princess in an ancient realm surrounded by dangers (and suitors), coming to realize herself, her destiny. Perhaps this is not even a young person’s story, as a balding critic writes.

Paul Buhle

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews

ANATOMY OF COMICS book review

Anatomy of Comics. Damien MacDonald. Flammarion. 2022. $40.

This is a companion book to a touring exhibition honoring the comics medium from the La Caixa Foundation in Spain. I came across this a while back and I’d meant to write a piece about it. I was instantly drawn to the striking cover. If you’re a fan of comics, do you recognize the artist? Given the nature of pop culture and media, it doesn’t matter if this image was, at one point, in wider circulation. Today, it needs to fight for attention with everything else. This is, in fact, by world-renown comics artist Charles Burns. It was originally a silkscreen print published in a limited edition by l’A.P.A.A.R. in 1985 and printed by Frederic de Broutelles. It has graced the cover of Metal Hurlant (Issue #120, 1986) as well as Dope Comix, Juxtapoz and El Vibora. But, I think it’s safe to say, it has gained a new life as the cover to this collection of exemplary comics art. As I suggest, this work of art, alas, is not the Mona Lisa of comics (not in terms of wide recognition) but figures mostly within the world of the comics cognoscenti.

Anatomy of Comics (2022) and PeePee PooPoo #1 (2024).

So, I take a bit of issue with up-and-coming cartoonist Caroline Cash for taking this Burns work and making it her own, with a few of her own flourishes, for the latest issue of her comic book series. No doubt, it’s a very clever tribute but she provides no attribution. The average reader will simply assume it is her own work. And, sure, it has become a mantra to “steal like an artist” and perhaps Burns is okay with the homage. The longer view is this: an artist is always aiming for artistic integrity and that takes time, perhaps a lifetime, to truly find one’s way. That brings me right back to this collection of comics art that honors that creative process of finding one’s way.

Catalan cartoonist Ricard Opisso Sala (1880-1966).

The act of creating comics that will stand the test of time is not a sprint but a marathon. The name of this exhibition is “Comics, Dreams and History” and what it makes clear is that there’s no room for pretense, not when you’re creating dreams. Damien MacDonald, a cartoonist himself, provides five essays, or monographs, to accompany a mix of short notes on selected pieces in the show. MacDonald sets the tone by stating he’s taking on the role more of an avuncular guide than an academic.

Saint Winsor!

Winsor McCay, it is safe to say, has reached a special and undeniable immortality and so it’s no surprise to find him included, and celebrated, in this book. His work will forever be spoken in the same breathe with any dissertation on the comics medium. It’s interesting to note that there is barely any mention of Art Spiegelman. Many of the other all-stars make a splash in this book: Winsor McCay, R. Crumb, Jack Kirby, Milton Caniff, but no Spiegelman tribute. And perhaps this is an example of the fluctuating waves of the never-ending assessments still being made on a relatively new art form. Basically, I don’t think it’s a deliberate slight at all but it does go to show that there’s always room for rethinking until you finally reach a certain undeniable apex, such as Saint Winsor!

Spanish cartoonist Antonio Hernandez Palacios (1921-2000).

The one mention in the book of Art Spiegelman is worth a mention here and that is in regards to a manifesto that was signed by Art and other notable comics artists. The following appeared in 1973 in Short Order Comix #1:

“It is the artist’s responsibility to hate, loathe and despise–fromica! Comics must be personal. The artist must strive to create quality product. It is our fervent belief that certain comics should still be trees! It is the reader’s responsibility to understand the artist. It is also the artist’s responsibility to understand the artist! Swiping is bad, experimentation is good!”

Milton Caniff (1907-1988).

Since we’re dealing with quotes, let’s try another. This one is by Will Eisner and is also included in this book. Perhaps in a mix of honesty and self-deprecation, Eisner summed up the cartoonist’s lot this way:

“I was a frustrated writer, a frustrated painter. And here, for the first time, was this marvelous opportunity that happens to any creative person once in a lifetime. Suddenly, there appears a medium, a receptacle, that takes your inaptitudes in both fields, puts them together, and comes out with an aptitude.”

— Will Eisner

That brings to mind a similar quote by Charles Schulz, this one is not in this book but from an interview with journalist Michael Johnson. I recall reading another version of it somewhere else too, as it’s basically a stock answer. This is not something you’ll easily find referenced anymore. Schulz is now Saint Charles, after all.

“My life is a story of almosts. I am almost a writer and almost an artist, so I do this for a living.”

— Charles Schulz

The flame keeps flickering, in and out, until either it dies off or it shines on, depending upon who leaps in to advocate for a legacy. Young people promote other young people, from one generation to the next. Right or wrong, one’s peers always seem to be of utmost importance. Only time will tell. One star’s once bright future may face a correction, flicker out and evaporate. There was a time in the wilderness even for undisputed icons, from the Mona Lisa to The Great Gatsby. Perhaps this book’s greatest purpose is to bring back a relatively obscure work by Charles Burns by having it on its cover, a way to cast a spotlight on it. And then unexpected things happen: like a newcomer upon the scene sees it and takes that same image for her own purposes. So, not trying to step on anyone’s toes. This is a tricky business when it comes to creating images and worthy of further discussion, which is an ongoing exploration for us folk interested in the study of comics and actually making comics.

If you have read any book on the comics medium, then you go to the head of the class. This one I found refreshing in its conversational tone and decidedly European vantage point. It’s a good solid overview and MacDonald provides many interesting observations. He provides an extended relaxed style that he pursues to good use as when he tackles the subject of secret identities or the power of comics to inform. Someone new to comics will find this very helpful and there’s enough nuance to keep more serious readers engaged.

John Romita (b. 1930).

The main goal here is to appreciate the comics medium and get a sense of what it takes to create something as inventive and original as the frenzied character observing his own eyeball from deep within his own skull. Charles Burns was a plucky 30-year-old artist in 1985 when the art on the cover of this book was first published. Burns was well on his way and listening to something telling him to step on the gas and create mind-blowing comics. This book is for everyone who enjoys mind-blowing comics and aspires to create some of their own. Good luck! It won’t be easy but it is well worth the effort no matter how long it may take you.

Charles Burns with PeePee PooPoo #1.

But, hang on, we’re not done yet. I am not one to ever leave well enough alone in the pursuit of attempting to get the full picture. My guess was that Charles Burns was fine with Caroline Cash’s tribute. As the above photo demonstrates, the maestro is more than fine with it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics