Tag Archives: Art

CREASED COMICS by Brad Neely comics review

Creased Comics. Brad Neely. New York Review Comics. 2026. 200pp. $24.95.

You might look through this book and wonder, Who is this guy? But keep looking and I’m confident you’ll conclude that Brad Neely is the real thing. Sure, some of the pages seem to be dripping with a cocky swagger. Or is it more of a wistful cry in the dark? Couldn’t it be both–and more?

Some people will either love or hate some of this stuff depending upon where they’re coming from: the lovers will love the raw sensibility; the haters will hate that very same raw sensibility. You can’t please everyone. Don’t even try. Maybe that’s how Brad ended up writing for South Park.

Sometimes you just need a naked guy on a hippo and call it a day. I’d love to be a naked guy on a hippo. Call it art. Call it whatever you like. This is work that may seem easy but there’s a special skill at play, especially to be able to create the work time and time again at a high level of consistency. The more you read through the book, I think you’ll agree that each page has something worthwhile to offer.

I think some of the best pieces in this book don’t use any text at all. The best ones bring to mind the work of Marcel Dzama, another artist who gravitates to more obscure and absurd themes. In fact, Dzama and Neely are of the same generation. This book you can consider as early work, spanning from when Neely was 19 up to age 34, a very fertile period in any artist’s life. Neely has forged his own path that includes a good bit of comedy bits, many you can find on Adult Swim.

Overall, this is a very enjoyable collection. I think it all goes to show that you can still be yourself, go for broke pursuing a relentless vision, and come out a success with just a few broken bones. It won’t be easy, but worth it, to walk that tightrope that all great artists must walk, of making something compelling while also making it look as easy as pie.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics

Matt MacFarland and His Comics Universe interview

Welcome to the Matt MacFarland comics universe!

Matt MacFarland is quite a prolific and versatile comics artist. Over the course of the last decade, he has cultivated his own comics universe made up of various characters searching for answers, looking for love in all the wrong places, and simply seeking a connection. These comics can be bittersweet, mysterious or downright hilarious. Something for everyone.

Matt’s story is that of a fine artist who has chosen to focus his efforts within the comics medium. That means he comes equipped with certain methods and tools from other artistic disciplines that can help in creating interesting comics work. Another key ingredient is follow-through and Matt has plenty of that. In the end, any creative endeavor is a process and Matt MacFarland is having fun with it.

It’s all about process. You can get rusty if you go too long without creating work, even if it’s just a little bit of sketching. It all adds up. Quite literally, one thing will lead to another as you continue your creative journey. This is what got Matt moving along from one world to the next.

As we discuss in our conversation, there are all sorts of crossover activities within creative circles. One of the most essential is a sense of community. One key form in the world of comics is collaborating on an anthology. These days, one of the best on-going anthologies is Rust Belt Review. Here, you can find Matt MacFarland as a contributor. Volume 7 features his OK Cryptic cast of characters.

Another thing to keep in mind about artists and comics artists is that this is a crowd that likes to bend the rules, blur the lines and mix it up. This explains why Matt MacFarland will always be an artist, as well as a comics artist. Consider his latest addition to his cursed pants comics series, Dark Pants: individual ceramic panels with three-dimensional elements. Take a closer look at the sample above. I think it’s safe to say MacFarland is passionate about his work.

Again, I have to stress that Matt MacFarland offers something for everyone. He can delve into the dark recesses of the adult mind and feel just as compelled to share childhood memories. Be sure to check out his graphic novella, Cookies and Herb, published by Fieldmouse Press.

I hope you enjoy the interview. As always, your Views, Likes and Comments at the Comics Grinder YouTube Channel are greatly appreciated. You can find this interview simply by clicking the above video. You can always simply type in “Comic Grinder” and find this, and other interviews, wherever you get your podcasts. Be sure to keep up with Matt and find his work for sale at his website.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Interviews

The Most Amazing Saturday Morning Rubbish Club comics review

The Most Amazing Saturday Morning Rubbish Club. w. Bill Tuckey. a. Francisco de la Mora. SelfMadeHero. 2025. 192pp. $22.99.

This graphic novel focuses on three children with special needs who start picking up trash in their local park and turn the activity into a club. The reader dives right into the action in a sort of journal entry format, each new day is marked off starting with a little calendar icon, beginning on Saturday, May the 14th. At a steady pace, we meet Arthur, age 11, with autism, which makes new environments a challenge; Finn, age 11, with cerebral palsy, which affects his ability to control his body; and Uma, age 8, with periventricular leukomalacia, which affects her speech, language and cognitive development. We also meet Connor, the kids’ adult guardian for these Saturday morning adventures; the kids’ parents; Connor’s pals, who wander the park; and Richard, a mysterious character who just happens to live under the park. All brought to you with delightfully droll British humor.

Francisco de la Mora‘s quirky artwork is right in step with Bill Tuckey‘s gentle and offbeat narrative. You couldn’t ask for a better pairing for a story equal parts enchanting and subversive. The overall theme is overcoming the obstacles to a better understanding of each and everyone of us. The conflict to overcome is peppered throughout the book with the White People, mere outlines of various passersby, people who don’t get it, who would rather not engage. The action that propels this story is hilarious and really pits the Other against the uncaring system-at-large. You think you can label someone a misfit and just push them aside? Well, think again!

Now, I don’t stand to attention at the mere mention of a new superhero title or a new toy or game tie-in. For me, the best comics sneak up on you, coming from a place of great thought and dedication–and that can come from anywhere, most often from indie and small press publishers. It’s just the nature of the entertainment industry and writing about it: always remain open to whatever content is out there but just know that the good stuff tends to follow a certain pattern and methodology. That is what I’ve always seen coming from art comic stalwart, SelfMadeHero, publisher of some of the most fun, insightful and engaging comics you will find. That kind of dedication isn’t just a brand but goes to the heart and soul of this remarkable publisher. A whole lot of other publishers, from small to big, could take a breather from their routines and learn something from SelfMadeHero. Alright, that’s enough for now. Sincerity doesn’t grow on trees. This graphic novel is the real deal.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Nathan Gelgud cartoonist interview

Nathan Gelgud

If you’re in L.A., be sure to participate in a comics workshop led by Nathan Gelgud on February 12, 2026. Sometimes, the last mentions need to go first. Seriously, this is an opportunity to learn the process of making comics from a very thoughtful and dedicated cartoonist. Gelgud is known for his comics about cinema and culture, published by The New York Times. His new book, Reel Politik, published by Drawn & Quarterly, is a collection of his hilarious comic strip about a bunch of art house movie theater employees who become revolutionaries. I got to chat with Nathan and get a better appreciation for his comic strip and his point of view.

Nathan Gelgud is someone who loves movies, all kinds of movies. He has studied film theory and history and viewed countless films. Along the way, he decided that a great way to express and share his passion is through comics. If you’re still unsure of what this is all about, think of it this way: the comics medium allows Gelgud to create work that explains things that often are only discussed in academic circles or within groups of film enthusiasts. He opens things up for everyone.

The idea of making things accessible for all the people is a big theme here. As I got to know Nathan’s comic strip, and then chat with him, I got a better appreciation for the man and his work. You can read my initial thoughts on Reel Politik in my review here. While preparing for my interview, I revisited the comic strip and delved deeper, getting to know the characters: Skip, the manager of the movie theater before it was taken over and turned into the people’s theater; Sandra, the slouch with supernatural powers; Bertie, the diehard revolutionary; and Hale, who prefers to sit on the fence until further notice. Perhaps I’m a little bit like Hale, open to new challenges but not always certain how to proceed. I suppose we’re all a little bit like Hale.

It was a pleasure to chat with Nathan. I know we could have covered even more and I feel like we get along. Hopefully, we’ll have him back. For now, enjoy this interview!

And remember, if you’re in the L.A. area, go to the Scribble event:

How To Make Comics

Thursday, Feb 12, 2026, 6:00 PM

How To Make Comics: A Workshop with Nathan Gelgud (New York Times, New Yorker, Hyperallergic, The Paris Review, Reel Politik).

– Make a one page comic

– Talk about being a working cartoonist

– Kill your inner critic

 

Guided workshop from 6-8pm

All are welcome to stick around for additional discussion and drawing until 9pm!

 

All levels welcome!

Materials provided

 

RSVP here, pay what you want at the door (no one will be turned away)

Arrive late and leave early!

EDITOR’S NOTE: This workshop is ongoing. Note that the next one is online and, as of this writing, is coming up on February 19th. Register by emailing Nathan! Find him at his website.

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Interviews

☀️ REEL POLITIK | comics review 💬

Review by Henry Chamberlain

Reel Politik. Nathan Gelgud. Drawn & Quarterly. 2025. 172pp. $20.

When you’re a young artist, with more ideals than money, your day job a prime indicator (barista, bookseller, movie usher), you know what you’re in for: your life is full of like-minded souls; and, heck, maybe you’ll get caught up in some clumsy attempts at overthrowing capitalism. That’s the vibe to Reel Politik, the hilarious comic strip by Nathan Gelgud, about a ragtag group of employees hanging on by their fingernails at a local indie movie theater. You can catch up with the latest post on Gelgud’s Instagram and you can enjoy a new collection published by Drawn & Quarterly.

Gelgud’s comics about movies, and the arts in general, appear in The New York Times, The New Yorker and The New York Review of Books. This new book of his Reel Politik comic strip gives you a handy and fun way to jump right into it all. You’re getting a special view of the whole moviegoer scene from someone who’s tracked it from various vantage points: projectionist, video store clerk, movie critic and, of course, as a cartoonist.

When you’re young, just starting out, you’ve got a whole plethora of defense mechanisms. The go-to shield for all manner of artists, from poseurs to die-hard bohemians, is to take on the role of an expert. Sometimes this works out really well, especially if you’ve actually read the book or viewed the movie you’re pontificating about–or maybe you’ve at least listened to a podcast on the subject at hand? Ah, standards have plummeted under the guise of being mired in privilege. Anyway, Gelgud provides delicious portraits of various cinema/activist purists among his characters such as Sandra, who believes a pure cinema experience includes going to a movie theater without knowing what film you’re about to view. This is not just a quirky philosophy for her but something she imposes upon her innocent customers.

A really good comic strip takes on a life of its own and is open to various interpretations. Gelgud, in the tradition of great cartoonists, is a keen social observer, ready to poke fun at the culture-at-large and its critics. A case in point is well into the narrative, once the movie employees have taken over and freed cinema of its capitalist shackles. Sandra is rejoicing over how cinema is now free and For The People. No one is enslaved to the strictures of the past–the hierarchy imposed by the Criterion Collection. Someone points out a man who has been put in a cage. Sandra shrugs and admits some people are less equal than others. The man in the cage is serving time for having scratched a copy of a beloved classic film! We’ve been brainwashed by a consumer culture but we’ve also been brainwashed by a slogan-heavy activist class.

Well, the politics in Reel Politik never gets too heavy. If you can’t take a joke, then maybe you’re part of the problem, no? Overall, this is a comic strip full of whimsical humor, biting satire and guided by a true love for a couple of often misunderstood art forms: cinema and comics!

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews

Coin-Op #10: Wet Cement comics review

Coin-Op #10: Wet Cement. New York. Co-Op Books, 50pp, $19.95

Review by Paul Buhle

Unbeknownst to me, a sister-brother creative team, comic artists Maria and Peter Hoey, have been dipping into a kind of Surrealism (by their own account) in their Coin-Op series. This short-book-length issue recalls immediately the themes of loneliness in modern life, dramatized in the work of Chris Ware and among others, the Canadian artist who calls himself Seth. Their comic panels exude cold, the coldness of a vanished era of popular culture.

From Coin-Op #10: Wet Cement.

I do not think that Ware, who has done a lot with the Superman mythos— more or less merging it with absent-parenthood—or Seth have ventured far into the realm of Surreailsm. But this is an issue deserving more discussion in the Hoeys’ work and Surrealist history-at-large.

Dadaists famously put scraps of daily life into new patterns, opening up the art world in new ways. Surrealists, distancing themselves from their precursors (with some personnel overlap), placed the dream and the unconscious at the center or their own vision of art and the possibilities that it raised for changing society dramatically…and for living differently as part of the change.

The opening chapter of Surrealism famously ended by 1941 or so, when Fascism spread world war and the Popular Front, very much supported by Communists, took over the job of fighting behind the lines. Surrealism no longer seemed so new or so interesting. And then again, a slew of Hollywood films, some of the best of them written by Communists, developed the themes of what French critics (some of them former Surrealists) would hail as film noir.

From Coin-Op #10: Wet Cement.

Noir made vivid sense in the post-war world, especially post-war America, where the idealism of wartime seemed to drain out and be replaced by cynicism, materialist individualism, and corruption. Detective and crime novels published earlier, those of Daniell Hammet in particular, offered a hard-boiled look that invited film adaptation (Hammet himself was teaching at the Jefferson School, a veritable red academy, after mustered out of the Service). Non-political and even right-wing writers and directors reached the same artistic solutions to the alienation of modern life. Even It’s a Wonderful Life (1947), the Christmas classic, could be seen as noir with a happy ending and the banker-swindler of the town as the concentration of everything wrong and corrupt in the wake of Fascism’s defeat.

Decades pass, Surrealist paintings win top honors at global art shows while the revolutionary vision seems ever more obscure, held in literal form by individuals and small groups mostly unrecognized. A new wave of interest, around 1960, is mostly concerned with form and not content, although it serves as a venue for gay and lesbian artists to emerge with their own visions alongside Pop and other influences of the day, shaped in part by the emerging Counter Culture.

The occasional Surrealist writer had been among the enthusiasts of animation, jazz, blues, and comics since the early 1950s. With Franklin Rosemont at the center of the Surrealist group, and revival in Chicago during the middle 1960s, the interest in popular culture and black culture (at the veritable center of Blues culture) emerged anew and with vigor.

Rosemont devoted himself, in critical/celebratory essays, to the likes of Chester Gould (Dick Tracy), Bill Holman (Smokey Stover), Basil Wolverton (Powerhouse Pepper) and, above all, Carl Barks (Donald Duck and family) among other comics artists, and to the great animation creators in Hollywood, above all, Tex Avery. It is intriguing that no avowed Surrealist in Rosemont’s circle or elsewhere actually became a comic artist, even as a wide circle of “Underground Comix” notables could, for instance, take part in a Surrealist theme, the one-shot Mondo Snarfo (1978) comes to mind. There, R. Crumb, Bill Griffith, Art Spiegelman and others, including comic publisher-editor-artist Denis Kitchen, here tried their hand at Surrealist ideas and images detached from anything like a formal Surrealist allegiance.

The Hoeys, arguably, have made the connection in Wet Cement. Not with the radical politics and dream-like claims of Surrealists, as such, but with the noir sensibility of the disconnections to reality. Their work, if made as individual comic panels transferred to studio art, could fit comfortably in the Surrealism exhibits that have re-emerged since the 2024 centennial of the founding of the movement in Paris.

From Coin-Op #10: Wet Cement.

It is difficult to make much narrative sense of the Hoeys’ saga of brainwave transmissions (something more and more believable) of secret authorities with sleep walkers’ dreams recorded. Not much more so with a loose plot about an imprisoned lover freed by  a techno-marvel, following an insight mysteriously received in a movie theater.  And so what.

From Karl Marx Bolan.

An earlier comic in their series, Karl Marx Bolan, has dead Rock ’n Roll stars Eddie Cochran and Gene Vincent magically saving a protagonist from an otherwise deadly car crash, prompting the young Bolan into a musical career that overturns the global order and makes him the PM of the United Kingdom! At last, the abysmal Labour Party is overthrown the right way, with left-wing hero Jeremy Corbyn sure to be close at hand.

The Hoeys’ Coin-Op Comics Anthology, 1997-2017 (Top Shelf, 2018) is regrettably out of print, most regrettably because some adventures in prose throw light on their other work. Their repeated treatment of jazz musicians, including the Paris music scene between the Wars, the site of experiments and exiles, is revelatory. Two Hollywood legends,  Orson Welles and Nicholas Ray, are also treated with sensitivity, if determinedly avoiding the high days of the Hollywood Left and the consequent Blacklist that shaped and reshaped cinema, from Golden Age to Noir.

In Perpetuity by Maria Hoey and Peter Hoey, 2024.

The Shadower, from Top Shelf Productions, March, 2026.

For classic Surrealists, the plot is overrated anyway.  The purposeful flatness of the art, the sense of the unbelievable becoming ordinary works effectively to send the reader into a kind of dreamscape. Just where the artists wish.

Paul Buhle

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews

Complete Works of Fletcher Hanks by Paul Karasik book review

The  Troubled World of Fletcher Hanks.

Turn Loose Our Death Rays and Kill Them All!: The Complete Works of Fletcher Hanks. Paul Karasik. Fantagraphics. 2025. 353pp. $44.99.

Review by Paul Buhle

By nature, comic art has been unpredictable, its deeper meanings as often elusive as banal, but above all vernacular. It gets no respect—a stand-up comic’s phrase now itself grown old—and needs none. At least until recent decades when the graphic novel began to replace the art book in the libraries of those (mostly younger) readers, the minority of them who still have growing libraries.

Glen David Gold, in his preface to the troubled mind of Fletcher Hanks, gives us a wonderful glimpse into his own discovery of the forgotten comic artist. He refers in passing to Henry Darger, whose work is the epitome of “outsider art” discovered in recent years and lifted up into museum displays.The reference is a good one even if Hanks was closer in, almost an accepted comic artist. The weirdness factor, however, points elsewhere.

Paul Karasik, a noted comic artist and commentator, fills in the picture with a short introduction. Hanks, born in 1887, son of a Methodist minister in Oxford, Maryland, joined a cartoonist school-by-mail in his teen years, the same school that enrolled E.C. Segar, Hank Ketcham and Chester Gould at different times. Hanks pretty soon married, had four children, and meanwhile indulged himself in heavy drinking and carousing, including violence against his own family. He disappeared with the family’s cash in 1930, pretty much to everyone’s satisfaction, resurfacing almost a decade later, several states away.

The new comic book industry was booming by 1939, with more room for unknowns, dubiously talented nonprofessionals, than likely at other times. It was also booming with superheroes and exotic adventures, outer space to jungle, airplane adventures to more bizarre and almost inexplicable genre. Hanks, drawing under several names (publishers imaginatively expanded their supposed list of artists in this way), could be identified as suited to violence, revenge, and such-like behavior that would have brought any consulting psychological to a ready conclusion. Hanks disappeared from the trade and from sight two years later. The introduction suggests that the overly-indulgent aunt of his early life was replaced by another indulgent lady in 1941, and he could go on being as dissolute as he chose…until his luck ran out.

There must be more to it. Perhaps because I was asked to write an introduction to the reprint edition of The Boy Commandos (first appearance, 1943), a comic with plenty of anti-fascist violence, I took pleasure in nearly all of it—as directed, by the ragtag ethnic bunch, toward the genuinely evil ones. Hanks, an adult in 1939, could already see in the newspapers and more graphically, in newsreels, the looming horror of war violence. Hanks’s heroes, in contrast to the courageous teens of Boy Commandos, looks pretty much the same, strip after strip, whether the theme is cosmic or human. Big muscles. Not a big talker. Not a lover, either, although the occasional beset female, human or otherwise, sometimes appeals to his good nature.

Karasik points to a certain parallel of Hanks’s work with Surrealism in 1939, very much part of the art world and even a popular culture world, thanks largely to Salvatore Dali. The role of the unconscious, introduced or dramatized in art, finds a ready home in these comics, barely below the surface. The surrealists seemed to know what they were doing, more or less, and how it fitted into the world of art. If in doubt, they had leader-savant Andre Breton to explain it to them.

Hanks, hacking out a living over the drawing board in the cramped quarters of a comic publishers’ office, had no theorist or savant to explain or to offer him inspiration. We can guess why he began drawing comics, as an extension of a youthful hobby, but no one knows why he stopped, let alone what was going through his mind as he plotted and drew his oeuvre. Found dead on a park bench in Manhattan, he reminds me of the uncle I never met, reportedly on or near skid row, Chicago, possibly passing in the same year, 1976.

What did he leave behind? We move quickly past a few pages of trial efforts made for the school, and onto a Joe Palooka knockoff, “Moe M. Down, ‘King of the Canvass Kissers,’”  a “brainless bone-buster” with a woman manager. Hanks quickly hit his stride with SciFi superheroes and stays there for most of his two year run.

Every story, almost every panel, looks like he could have used another round of training as an artist. The faces are wrong, if not terribly wrong. The backgrounds appear done in a hurry, without any artistic intention whatsoever. Violence is the key. Stardust, known as “The Super Wizard,” has almost unimaginable powers. He is, after all, “master of space and planetary forces,” whose “scientific use of rays” protect him from all kinds of assaults.

As the “most remarkable man that ever lived,” he can break up the conspiracies of mobsters and not only by them. A “Fifth Column” of traitors seek to destroy New York with their terrible techno-weapons. Strardust comes to the rescue, finally turning the leader into a harmless human rodent. The last panel nevertheless warns in the last panel,  “America…Beware of the Fifth Column.” Was Hanks sneaking into the German-American Bund meetings still drawing crowds in 1940?

But this is by no means Hanks’s finest superhero. Fantomah, “Mystery Woman of the Jungle” and “the most remarkable woman that ever lived,” spends her time defending the jungle population of tribespeople, and likewise the animals, against militarized white invaders. She has the power to evoke nature’s revenge, and she reminds me more than a little of Aquaman, perhaps my own favorite hero.

Thus not only the usual lions, tigers, etc, but “beasts unknown to white men” and looking amazingly like dinosaurs, also “respond to her wizardry.”  Sometimes, moments of rage against the wrongdoers. she changes the form of her face that most remarkably becomes a skull seeking revenge for martyred Africans. And then…she becomes a beautiful blonde again!

There’s more here,in Hanks’ own bestiary, including a few continuing odd characters like two-fisted Big Red Maclane of the northern woods. Without space adventures, the wild imagination of Hanks becomes pretty mundane. Mere comic book filler.

But let’s look at these comics in a somewhat different light: they seem to offer a subconscious art, art of a certain kind, with garish colors, violence, and patterns of a troubled artist at a most troubling moment in modern US history. Amidst a very mixed scene of different painting styles taking the stage or gallery in 1940— and against the background of the rising comic book—older artistic fashions began to fade. The severely representative, historical-minded public art of the New Deal is losing its lure. Perhaps it was too positive or just too literal to appeal any longer in the same way.

Famously, for those who followed contemporary major art trends, Jose Clemente Orozco, a representative of Mexican super-realism, offered up ”Dive Bomber and Tank,” in glaring colors. An emerging pattern of “Symbolic Realism” took on  scary psychological themes. The moment saw what would become Abstract Expressionism on the rise, alongside the gloomy realism of Edward Hopper and George Ault, among others. Would Hanks, working on his comics in New York, the center of art interest and publicity in the US, have been unmoved by these widely-publicized examples?

Perhaps, with Hanks, comic art is already pointing toward the slightly more sophisticated brutality of Crime Does Not Pay, the leading popular series during the decade just before censorship. Or perhaps toward its chief rival in those years, and perceived enemy of children’s minds: horror comics. Born under the shadow of Fascism’s menace, drawn by men whose families often enough faced the worst of the horrors ahead, comic art could not very well avoid a kind of psychic crisis invading popular art. Here we find Fletcher Hanks.

Paul Buhle

Leave a comment

Filed under Book Reviews, Comics

THE EPHEMERATA by Carol Tyler book review

Carol Tyler, The Ephemerata: Shaping the Exquisite Nature of Grief. Seattle: Fantagraphics, 2025. 232pp, $39.95.

Review by Paul Buhle

The joys of childhood, according to folklore, scholarship and wide personal experience, lead to sadness in old age. How could it be otherwise in a secular age? Carol Tyler is an artist of sadness, artistically calculated remorse, and a distinct curiosity about the whole train of human experience too often neglected in comic arts (because they are supposed to “entertain”).

Her early, spectacular work encompassed her pressing her father about the grumpiness and evasion that she figured out, probably by her teenhood, to be undiagnosed PTSD. Dad was one of the hundreds of thousands, at a modest estimate, who did not, could not speak about his experiences in the Second World War. To acknowledge let alone describe them, even to the most intimate of family members, would be to show weakness of character, or perhaps they would bring to the surface things that could easily become unbearable. You’ll Never Know, a trilogy of these stories, won her a much-deserved fame. She has added to it in various ways: teacher, stand-up comic, and scholar.

To this saga, we cannot fail to add another. A second volume of Tyler’s “grief series” will relate her life to that of her late husband, Justin Green, who as much as reinvented a key trope of modern literature for comics, and not just Underground Comix of lore. His one-shot Binky Brown Meets the Virgin Mary delved his own earlier life, the confused kid who became obsessed with religious imagery as he tried to navigate his own OCD.

Green’s totemic achievement encouraged other artists, most famously Art Spiegelman, toward a similar path about self and family. Robert Crumb was already there, but only in metaphors of various kinds (a little later, an identified Troubled Crumb becomes a live character as well). These were the Walking Wounded of comic art, and their success emboldened thousands of others, including Alison Bechdel (with Fun Home) to take a similar path. When Underground Comix could be seen properly as having added something decisive to comic art, Justin Green stood high, even if he could not continue comics, finding his modest role in sign-painting.

A lot closer to home, Carol Tyler dealt with Justin and their daughter, Justin’s abandonment of both of them for another woman (he came back after a few months, guilt-ridden the rest of his life), as she followed Justin in seeking self-discovery in comic art. She had the skill and personal intensity to develop, especially in themes particular to women artists and other women.

The Ephemerata is fascinating for so many reasons. What her earlier trilogy seemed to feature, dense black and white drawing, is not so much in these pages. It would take a finer eye than mine to suggest just what she has done with sometimes thin drawings, near full pages of hard-written prose, carefully chosen shading and sometimes spare but seemingly accurate portrayals of herself and family, including Justin.

Let me stick to the story, the best that I can. For her, life’s dearest discoveries seem first of all to be in the garden. Never formally trained as a gardener,  using whatever land happens to be available, she discovers her sometimes-fulfilled self but also Melancholy with a capital “M.” She eventually labels the branches of trees (p.18) with deaths of those she has known and loved, such as “Worn Out” or “Too Soon”  or “One I had to Put Down” (her dog).

In a secular age, the older, religious-based consolations or rationalization of our Dear Dead have slipped away. No doubt, the collapse of American society, the glum prospects for global nature and so on, also pay their part. She does not seem to think that her remarkable work, bound to have lasting value, is any condolence, at least for herself. Ahead is Darkness,  labelled “Griefville.” For pages and pages she wanders in what she imagines to be Victoria Park in London, with the statue of the queen on hand, dominating the landscape as well as the age.

She comes curiously to that forgotten headpiece, the Bonnett, typically used (I did not know this) by women treating the Civil War wounded and when aiding the victims of the Flu in the late 1910s. She imagines herself entering a bonnet large enough to shelter her, today the size of a Manhattan (or Tokyo) apartment. Is it perhaps a womb regained?

Never mind. As she leaves to further explore the landscape, we realize that she is reenacting Dante’s famous traversing of the Underworld. These are not damned for their sins,  tormented by little devils, but the sufferers are also not to be consoled. By now, by p.63, we come to the main point of the book: the suffering of those who, so far, survive.

Tyler has an abundance of visual metaphors, invented expressions both verbal and visual, terrible moments (like “The Realm of Cessation,” reached at the point of death) and what, in her imagination, happens afterward.

I am going to come back, for a moment, to a 1950s, Middle American family discussion about Heaven. My father loved to sing in the choir, and my mother considered weekly church attendance to be mandatory. But they weren also modern Congregationalists, and she once quipped to me “You make your heaven or hell on earth.”  Forget about the Afterlife: it was all about kind metaphors that the minister offered, and the sense of community.

Carol Tyler is there and not there. She boldly rips off her clothes (pp.89-90) to help her cancer-ridden sister in the shower. A couple pages later, she is a college art teacher, a little later she is maneuvering her OCD husband to help a little with household chores, or she is treating a mother getting worse, or she is remembering when a stray dog suddenly appeared and became a beloved pet.

A mean-spirited family member, or a hard-nosed psychologist, might say that artist Tyler lets herself in for abuse, faithfully helping a father who is losing it but evidently saving his strength to lash out at her. Then again, she really does help her failing mother, eventually taking mostly upon herself the task of scattering the ashes. She recalls her mother’s hard-wrought accomplishments, managing the family plumbing business while raising the kids, including an autistic daughter.

This is not an unusual story for middle Americans in the middle twentieth century, but she tells it with great sympathy and real insight. And tells it over again, from different angles,about different moments in her mother’s life and especially the final phase.

The final chapter is really about herself and husband Justin (their daughter, leaving a troubled family, is long gone). His OCD seems to get worse and is mixed with paranoid delusions—I can remember his writing to me about the “conspiracy” around the 9/11 bombings—and then she leaves Justin for the next book.

She is herself alone, with worsening Tinnitus (join the club!), difficulty in sleeping,rare moments of joy or pleasant self-discovery. Trees give her solace. Her friends, also provide joy. Or her sisters, while they are still around. The conclusion is no conclusion. She needs another volume of ruminations.

Like any other reviewer who is also an admirer, I am happy that Tyler finds consolation in her art. I’d like to say that this Ohio story is about Midwestern suffering, Protestant or Catholic, large city, small town or suburb. We repress so much, it is  obviously in our nature to do so. We rarely grasp the politics and economics of our suffering as firmly rooted in class society and the particular deep illnesses in US society, rootless by nature and a lack of deep history. She has taken on, as an artist, a different set of particulars.

Paul Buhle

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews, Paul Buhle

Wally Mammoth: The Sled Race by Corey R. Tabor & Dalton Webb

Wally Mammoth: The Sled Race. (w) Corey R. Tabor. (a) Dalton Webb. HarperCollins. 2025. 32pp. $10.39.

There’s a fanciful internal logic that kids and adults will love from the very first page onward in Wally Mammoth: The Sled Race. If this is in step with current kid favorite trends, that’s a bonus. I tune into its broader timeless appeal. My dear beloved friend, Dalton Webb, is the illustrator. He passed away only a week ago and he leaves behind many saddened souls who appreciate him and his amazing skill. This, no doubt, includes the book’s creator and writer, Corey R. Tabor, who dedicated the book: “To Dalton, for bringing Wally to life.”

If anyone could tap into the innocence and playful quality of a precocious little Wooly, or Wally, Mammoth, it would be Dalton Webb. In the many years I knew him, Dalton always had at least one, if not more, cat companions. He was utterly fascinated with crows. He may have been one in another life. Dalton loved any creature, big or small, that would fit into a magical realm. So, that sensibility of celebrating joyous mayhem at a rollicking tea party is at play here.

The story is elegantly simple. Wally and his two buddies sort of stumble into a sled race with a confused notion of what the heck they’re doing. And, like a classic tale by Dr. Seuss, they manage, if you read between the lines, to delve into philosophical questions: What is a competition? What does it mean to win–or to lose? And, yes, this is for young readers. But adults, especially parents, will love it too.

This is a gentle story about how it doesn’t matter if you win or lose but how you play the game. I know it’s a story that resonated with Dalton and it is how he lived his life. In the end, Dalton did indeed win the game of life. This delightful story brings that sentiment home in a light and engaging way sure to please the wee ones.

1 Comment

Filed under Children's Books, Comics

TALES OF PARANOIA by R. Crumb comics review

Tales of Paranoia. R. Crumb. Fantagraphics. 2025. 36pp. $5.99.

A lot of the public has caught up with cartoonist-provocateur R. Crumb. More people than ever are ready to do some of their own provoking. But don’t count the master out. Fantagraphics is releasing, Tales of Paranoia, Crumb’s first new comic book in 23 years. A show featuring original pages from the book is on view (and for sale) at David Zwirner gallery in Los Angeles thru December 20, 2025. The leading cartoonist of the Sixties underground, one of the greatest ever, Crumb’s influence cannot be overstated. Whenever you see the work of a comics artist that features an alter ego stand-in for the creator, commenting and complaining about life’s foibles, you can thank R. Crumb. He single-handedly invented the one-person comics anthology with the launch of Zap Comix in 1967, a progenitor to the whole “autobio comics” genre that was to evolve into the “alternative comics” scene into the 21st century. Following the Crumb tradition of a Larry David-like anti-hero are countless cartoonists, including such notables as Julie Doucet, Gabrielle Bell, Julia Wertz and Noah Van Sciver. With this in mind, it is no small feat to have R. Crumb yet again hold his own—and at the age of 81!

Page from R. Crumb, I’m Afraid, 2025
© Robert Crumb, 2025
Courtesy the artist, Paul Morris, and David Zwirner

Everything you could expect in a R. Crumb comic book can be found in this new book. I have read Tales of Paranoia a number of times and I am thoroughly impressed with how well it all holds together, one story blending into the next, not an easy thing to do well with a collection of short works. I’m delighted right away to see that distinctive, and consistent, lively drawing line. Crumb is a sui generis cartoonist: a one-of-a-kind artist who is highly accessible; sort of inviting other cartoonists to join in but most likely leaving them creating lesser replicas of his work. For the reader, Crumb is casually inviting you into his world: creating an illusion that you have entered an inner sanctum, whether it is the human condition, the national psyche or what may or may not be his own mind.

Reading every crumb of Crumb.

It is important to process every crumb of Crumb. He has written and rewritten, formatted and reformatted, to the point that he’s amassed layers of meaning, leaving room for argument and counterargument and further interpretation. Like any artist, he has absorbed the current zeitgeist and reflects it back to the reader. This leaves me wondering about his current batch of rants and riffs, as much expressions of his beliefs as a satire of how we collectively express ourselves: begin with the outrage and go from there, just like one podcaster emulates another podcaster, ad infinitum. Or, if you wish to take a longer view, it’s all about finding a way to tell the most compelling story, going back to the first stories ever told.

Crumb’s hobby horse of choice in this book is the potentially nefarious background attached to the Covid-19 vaccine and the cottage industry that has grown around it. This is not the only subject that Crumb sinks his teeth into but it is definitely at the top and provides a structure for further “ranting.” As any good storyteller knows, it’s all in the pacing. Like a good conversationalist, Crumb eases into this or that fact, gently but firmly citing his sources. Crumb makes his case for Big Pharma’s track record of corruption and encourages the reader to do their own research. Crumb finds nuggets of wisdom from a wide range of books and publications that he dutifully cites. He also includes such controversial figures as Joe Rogan and RFK Jr. which gives me pause. That said, Crumb insists you don’t have to like or agree with them but be open to what is coming from their corners. I conclude, if it is information resonating with the public, then it takes on a value, at the very least, for doing that.

We have gone from a tradition of “serious people” in high office and places of authority (John Kerry, Robert Reich, Hillary Clinton) to this current Trumpian transgressive period of unqualified “unserious people” in places of power (Kash Patel, Kristi Noem, RFK Jr.). Midway through the book, the comic “Deep State Woman,” points out that even a “highly qualified” person isn’t always your best bet. Here, Crumb can ease up on his “paranoid” character and simply focus on presenting a compelling portrait of a dangerous career bureaucrat.

With a nod to the mind-boggling complexity of all the world’s machinations, Crumb, more than once, looks upward and pleads for some words of encouragement from a higher power. Crumb depicts himself asking for some clarification from God and receiving the bare minimum for his efforts. All we can do is try. It’s nice to see that Crumb hasn’t given up.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Comics Reviews, R. Crumb