Category Archives: Graphic Novel Reviews

Palestine by Joe Sacco, New Edition, book review

Palestine. Seattle: Fantagraphics, 2024. 288pp. $34.99.

Guest review by Paul Buhle

The name “Sacco” rings a curious bell in radical memory….from a century ago. I mean of course Sacco of the Sacco-Vanzetti Case—two avowed Italian-American anarchists Nicol Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, shoemaker and fish peddlar—put on trial, then executed in 1927, for a crime that could never be proven. Demonstrations took place in cities across the world, nowhere more than in Boston, site of the court verdict and deaths. It was in some ways a last historic moment of anarchism, whose star had faded with the rise of Communist parties. But it was also the beginning, in retrospect, of the grand mass movement of antifascism of the 1930-40s, a movement that urged forward the struggles for industrial unionism and racial equality along with the defeat of the Nazis and their allies.

Is the name more than a coincidence for today’s master narrator of war and suffering, Joe Sacco? Perhaps not. And then again, social movements come and go, while “martyrdom” remains high among the most appealing sentimental forces imaginable. Crowds around the world have for centuries marched in parades, carrying drawings or photos of their vanquished. The irony of Joe Sacco and also his artistic triumph is his unwillingness to accept the sentimental verdicts of history as the only possible narrative.

The reappearance of his most famous work, Palestine, just now, inevitably has a special significance. Apart from the truly beautiful production by Fantagraphics, what is most new here is a fresh Afterword by a journalist for the Israel daily newspaper (and source of major political dissent) Ha Aretz. Amira Hass, born in Jerusalem, lived in Gaza for a few years of the 1990s, now resides in El-Bireh, the West Bank. She wants us to know that on its original publication, the book captured the hopes of 1990-91, when she was a Jewish peace activist and not yet a journalist. The hope remains and cannot be extinguished, no matter the level of violence and the extent of destruction.

Thus a book of pain becomes a book of hope as well. Perhaps the martyrs on both sides, all sides, and all the martyrs of the twentieth century, will be redeemed in memory. It is a tall order but not an unimaginable one.

But there is much, much more to Sacco and this book, in comics terms alone. Consider that the genre of “underground” or “alternative” comics emerged in the Vietnam era. Rather suddenly, visualized sentiments forbidden in the pages of comic books or in comics, as well as sex acts, antiwar and environmental protests, not to mention Women’s Liberation, could be found on and around nearly every major campus. “Head Shops” of marijuana-use, themselves unimaginable earlier, carried these curious publications and the local underground newspapers that spread selected comic strips faster and further than comic books alone could.

Joe Sacco was not quite of an age to join the beginners. The Head Shops and the underground newspapers were long gone by his appearance in the 1980s. And for that matter, he did not (literally) draw upon the mainstream comic-art tradition as had most of the artists. And also for that matter, he thought of himself as a journalist, albeit a visual journalist, more than anything else. He secured a journalist’s credentials and implied promise of a living wage as a reason to place himself in Gaza of 1990.

The famed literary theorist and music critic Edward Said, writing an introduction to the second edition of Palestine in 2001, said most memorably that here, a new kind of witness to history had appeared. “The unhurried pace and the absence of a goal in his wanderings emphasizes that he is neither a journalist in search of a story nor an expert trying to nail down the facts in order to produce a policy.” (iii). Further, “Sacco seems to mistrust militancy, particularly of the collective sort that bursts out in slogans or verbal flag-waving.” (v).

Rather, Said suggests, Sacco is more like novelist Joseph Conrad, who invented the character Marlow because someone must investigate, explain to himself and to readers, those populations reduced to confinement and without realistic hopes of escape. It is not heroism he finds but human reality, good and bad, kindly and harsh, thus a reality not unlike that of the rest of us in vastly more fortunate circumstances.

Some critics have made a special point of the artist’s own upbringing in Malta, heavily bombed in the Second World War. A mother’s trauma years after the events would have been part of a child’s life, by extension of a child’s own experience. Sacco’s other books, it is important to say, include a depiction of a Balkan city, Gorzade, in the midst of the 1990s wars, and a sort of semi-book art work of connected images around the First World War, the “war to end all wars” that foreshadowed wars growing steadily worse, in one technological way or another into the threat of all-encompassing global destruction, ever since. Seeing into the illusions of wars-to-bring-peace, Sacco already saw All. Or so it seems to me. Sacco and Vanzetti, the lowly shoe clerk and fish-peddler in early twentieth century America, believed that wars would end only with the end of State  Power everywhere. They surely had a point.

There is something more to be said about Joe Sacco in the history of comic art. The field is changing rapidly, its print form overwhelmed by comic art on the Web, or perhaps not.  His work, unlike that of Justin Green (and followed by Art Spiegelman among others), did not set the pace for other artists, despite being highly personal. Even those literally drawing upon experiences of mass suffering do not approach the methods of the artist’s own painstaking personal presence. Sacco is not like those around him and yet he is not absent from their intimate attention, or they from his.

To risk an analogy that is closer to the opposite of an analogy: Sacco is more like the fabled Robert Crumb of Underground Comix history who, by imbibing LSD and recuperating the comic art styles of the 1910s-30s, found something that he could not have expected. Crumb (a long-distance friend of the reviewer) often suggested that he had been taken over, and drawn stories by instinct. Sacco is nearly the opposite in many ways. But he has also been taken in and overtaken, actually by the scenes before his eyes. And because he sees with new eyes, he allows us to do so, too.

He closes his own Foreword to this edition by asking “Has the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians become a zero sum game where there must be one emphatic winner and one subjugated—or eliminated —loser?…One can only pray that good people on each side will find each other, walk away from the brink, and seek a just path.” (Vi) To that, we can only add an Amen, in any religion or non-religion and any language. I am sure that the martyred, anti-religious anarchists Sacco—the other Sacco—and Vanzetti would have said the same.

Paul Buhle

4 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Blurry by Dash Shaw graphic novel review

Blurry. Dash Shaw. New York Review Comics. 2024. 480 pp. $34.95.

Dash Shaw is one of our most interesting, and fearlessly experimental, auteur cartoonists. At this point in his career, any new book is a big deal, and deservedly so. Blurry is quintessential Dash Shaw with its moody and enigmatic vibe, a refinement of what began with his debut graphic novel, the family saga, Bottomless Belly Button, back in 2008. What new tricks will he pull out of his hat this time? Shaw is someone who takes his work seriously, almost as seriously as his followers. I say this because I think he operates with a healthy dose of irreverence and gets on with making the work and lets the comics cognoscenti do what they do. Comics, the actual creation of comics, has a way of keeping you honest. If you roll up your sleeves and just dive into the art process, any sense of preciousness should fall by the wayside.

As much as some comics scholars talk about comic strips as the source to the comics medium, they rarely pay much attention to contemporary cartoonists who do comic strips. The conversation quickly turns to something that is thought to be more high-minded. These same comics scholars view an elegant and mysterious version of comics by someone like Dash Shaw, and their delicate antennas go straight up, gravitating to the latest big score of “art comics” to pontificate over. Anyway, it’s good to bring this up since Shaw, you can’t deny it, is one of the most celebrated artist-cartoonists. With that in mind, what often turns out to be the most intriguing thing here is how the story is told rather than the story itself, much like a poem. In this case, Shaw presents the reader with a disparate group of individuals, all engaging in their own quiet and subtle ways, with no obvious throughline connecting everyone to each other. This is a story as much about mood as it is about motivation, which makes perfect sense to me. Shaw has, throughout his career, maintained a deceptively simple style which, I think, acts as a good ballast to offset the more esoteric nature of his storytelling.

But a story takes shape as you plunge into this nearly 500-page comics tome. Shaw has a penchant for the sprawling saga, sprinkling it with the less obvious bits of flotsam and jetsam of life. By its very nature, “flotsam and jetsam” keep a low profile until perhaps a precocious storyteller makes hay out of it. And Shaw makes excellent hay. Keep in mind that this graphic novel is a collection of stories of seemingly random individuals who, bit by bit, become more and more interconnected by seemingly random bits. Given that Shaw is determined to evoke the chaos of real life, some of these stories fall flat in their quotidian understatement. But that is the whole point, like a sadder than sad Chris Ware comic. Still, like in real life, gems emerge. Shaw is among the best in employing the tools of comics. You could create quite a heated panel discussion at your next comics art festival on his use of the four-panel grid. So, if you’re a follower of such comics connoisseurs as Frank Santoro, there is much to love here. That said, with Shaw’s keen satirical wit and overall social observation, there is much to love here too on that level alone. Enjoy it as a rad soap opera if you wish. There are enough pages here to have you feeling like you’re bingeing your latest favorite show.

The writer’s life.

My favorite gem among this collection of character vignettes is the plight of professional writer Christie Oliver, something of an alter ego for Shaw. Among all the characters who are scrutinized here, it seems to me that she manages to pluck the most out of her situation, which isn’t all that bad: a writer who gains some success from being picked up by a prestigous publisher and then must navigate her way to sustaining her early promise. Christie ends up using a technique to get out of a rut that is also utilized by a different character, Fiona, in a modest yet stressful place in her own life. So, each character, in their own way, no matter how meaningless their life may seem, is up to something, trying things out, doing interesting things.

Along with Dash Shaw, Derek Kirk Kim is another cartoonist I greatly admire. Recently, Kim told me that one of the most satisfying works in comics can involve bringing together parties that have no obvious connection–and then finding it. He was referring not only to his own masterful graphic novel, Same Difference, but also to Gene Luen Yang’s American Born Chinese. Both books revolve around a group of disparate characters who, at first, don’t seem to share anything in common. And so it is with Blurry. For a long and extended amount of time, Blurry takes us down one existential rabbit hole after another. It is a series of prolonged moments which brings to mind another favorite auteur cartoonist, Paul Pope. Part of his bag of tricks includes this stretching of time, which is most prevalent in manga and anime. Shaw presents us with characters who are having trouble with an assortment of life struggles including the most simple of tasks, like deciding on a flavor of ice cream, which becomes an endless pondering, requiring a good deal of stretching of time, a predicament that keeps popping up and actually runs through the entire length of the book. You can’t miss it. All these characters, at least at first, seem to lack the fortitude to contend with anything substantial but that is exactly what they will need to acquire in order to make more sense of each of their lives–and there lies the bigger picture, the whole shooting match, and what will connect each and every one of these characters. Well worth sticking around to see how that turns out.

1 Comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Dorothy Day: Radical Devotion book review

Dorothy Day: Radical Devotion.  By Jeffry Odell Korgen and Christopher Cardinale, with Friar Mike Lasky. New York/Mahwah: The Paulist Press, 2024. 106pp. $16.95.

Guest review by Paul Buhle

A most unusual comic! These days, meaning the last fifty years, Dorothy Day (1897-1980) has slipped out of the news but also into an official Church process,  now a decade old, of literally making her a Saint. Jeffry Korgen, the principal (and official) activist to push for her sainthood, is also the moving force here. Seen in this light, it would appear  a daunting responsibility for a comic. But Korgen and artist Christopher Cardinale measure up to the task.

The beautifully written and drawn story takes us back to her youth,  where as a child, she survives the Bay Area earthquake and what became known as the Great Fire. The comic passes over her time in my own hometown of Urbana, Illinois (she also seems to have found the place dull, and left after two years of college), to arrive in Manhattan in 1916 as a would-be journalist. She “discovers” poverty and makes her own first effort to provide a sympathetic, empathetic journalism of support. In her way, she will always be a muckraker, in the honored tradition of going and talking to the impoverished and exploited about their lives, and honestly reporting what she learns. Soon she will invite them into her life.

For many of her devotees beyond the Church or any religion, however, her days in Greenwich Village have always stood out. Never again a place like this in the 1910s, never a crowd like this, with bold art, theatrical experiments, modern dance and radical politics mixed together with low rents. Young Dorothy supported both the egalitarian Industrial Workers of the World and the Socialist Party (working for a while for its Daily Call). A staffer for the brilliant artistic Masses magazine, she tries to keep it going as the ostensibly liberal Woodrow Wilson administration, launching the Red Scare, prosecutes the editors for opposing US entry into the First World War.

Many of the readers of The Eleventh Pregnancy (1924), her famed semi-fictional novel and of lively writings about her life dwell upon her time with Eugene O’Neill. Then the nation’s greatest social-minded playwright (Arthur Miller and Tony Kushner among others follow him and receive the same conservative outrage), O’Neill attracts her to the Provincetown Players. She could have been an actress! That is, if modesty had not set her on another road.

Several gripping pages show Dorothy in another campaign of the 1910s, for Woman Suffrage. In this one, the federal government really does jail her. In sharing the poverty of fellow up close inmates, she ponders the power of religion. It will take her a while yet to get to her calling. The Wilson administration, even amidst a fury of jailing thousands of union members, is successfully pressured to let the suffrage protesters go.

I could wish that the comic gave more time and space to the adventures that found her shortly after marrying money, traveling to Europe and writing her  novel, among the handful from the times still read as a guide to the Bohemians of the day. This follows a love affair, an abortion (purportedly by none less than Dr. Ben Reitman, Emma Goldman’s lover) and a failed attempt to suicide. A new lover, a baby and her insistence upon a baptism—against the father’s arguments— finds her convincingly alone, without the institutional connection that will soon enough be decisive for the rest of her life.

We learn, but only at the end of the book, that she remained, until the end of her time on earth, an intimate friend to leading Communist novelist and literary critic Mike Gold and of leading Communist Party official Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, the “girl Wobbly” of the 1910s who goes on to embrace Moscow. These friendships seem to me a decisive clue to the psychological mysteries of her character that have, in the face of considerable scholarship, remained somehow elusive. She takes part in the great Unemployed March of 1932 and seeks out one of the most curious and contradictory characters of the day, Peter Maurin. An fervent and, it must be considered, largely reactionary opponent of the mass strikes leading to the CIO, Maurin has another plan. Voluntary poverty, voluntary cooperation based on manual labor of a mostly agricultural character, all this looks something like an ecological, democratic vision. Or maybe not, depending on one’s view of mass life in the Middle Ages.

The Communists’ Daily Worker and its many counterparts in non-English languages of ethnic working class communities might not have possibly existed without the illusion of the USSR. The Catholic Worker, a weekly with an astonishing circulation that sometimes reached almost 200,000, based itself on another illusion, the voluntary cooperation that would, somehow, displace capitalist power.

The Catholic Worker, for those who now remember its thriving days, was lively and well-written, with appealing stories and quite wonderful illustrations. Peter Maurin did not even like it! But the Hospitality Houses of his inspiration had a great appeal. The “CW” brought in the most progressive figures of the Church, a remarkable thing for a historical moment when antiSemitism had a powerful influence, far beyond the considerable reach of famed radio evangelist Father Coughlin. That the CW would support the Sit Down Strikes and even help lead a reform movement of seamen against their typically corrupt (but avowedly Catholic) AFL bosses testified to her determination and savvy.

Indeed, somehow, with friends on high, she managed it, as she supported the the Spanish Republic when most of the Church, including the Pope, openly favored Franco and his anticommunist partners, the Fascists. She managed an antiwar sentiment, then ardent advocacy of Conscientious Objectors, even as the Second World War embraced the nation and the world.

Pacifism and antiwar sentiment of the Cold War years, even more than the existence of the Hospitality Houses, the civil rights movement and the continuing struggle against poverty, defined Day in the public eye through most of the following decades. The New Yorker took her up as a “personality” as the Cold War deepened. The FBI pursued her, albeit without the harassment and public “investigations” that hounded members and former members of the Left, emphatically including unionists.

Hitting the fifty year age mark in 1956, Day built the Catholic Worker movement as a writer and a public personality, perpetually on tour. Today’s “Nuns on a Bus” owes a lot to her historical inspiration, as does the wide embrace of Liberation Theology during the last decades of the twentieth century. City officials in Manhattan in the 1950s plotted to shut down the movement by shuttering the Hospitality Houses for code violations. She was put on trial very much like her contemporaries…the publishers of comic books.

Her civil rights activity and her opposition to the Vietnam War would offer the last, grand moments of her public life. She would not back down in her opposition, even her support of fellow Catholics who burned draft center documents, and met verbal assaults verbally by the all-powerful Cardinal Spellman.

The Pope, the newest Pope, was more or less on her side. She gained a powerful new ally in Cesar Chavez and his farm workers’ movement. There, in the religious faith of the mostly Chicano workers, she may have found the radicalism lacking in the Church’s own anticommunist Labor Schools and the notorious collaboration with the FBI and Chamber of Commerce to take down unwanted union leaders.

Day was, finally, more than an icon, and as we near the end of the comic, we are reminded that hers is very much a story with many twists and turns—but less in her than in the worlds around her. Someone told me an anecdote about the “sainting” process that would have surely made Dorothy laugh.  One of the big bishops, probably one advanced by the dark knight of reaction, Pope Benedict, wanted to halt the sainthood process because Dorothy was a “harlot,” that is a bohemian, in her young days.   If not a free lover, she was at least someone who did not marry the father. How dare the Church honor her! The elderly bishop was reminded that if she DID become a saint, it would seriously endanger his celestial status, more or less forever: a very convincing argument indeed. Dorothy passed muster, even with him.

In the wonderful, final pages of Dorothy Day: Radical Devotion, we find her at death’s door and beyond, her wake attended by the likes of I.F. Stone and Abbie Hoffman. She had become the counterpart, perhaps, of Woody Guthrie, saints needed for the continuing guidance of their example, words and deeds. From the (continuing) Hospitality Houses to the fiercely persecuted Keystone Pipeline protesters, her story goes on and on.

Paul Buhle

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Emil Ferris My Favorite Thing Is Monsters Review via Notes

“My Favorite Thing Is Monsters” Vol 2 (of 2) by Emil Ferris

Notes on Emil Ferris’s My Favorite Thing Is Monsters, Books One and Two by Nick Throkelson

Editor’s Note: In keeping with the unconventional spirit of the work being reviewed, cartoonist Nick Thorkelson presents a review within a collection of notes on the two-part epic work by Emil Ferris.

Emil Ferris draws over rules. Ha!

The following notes assume some familiarity with Emil Ferris’s comics masterpiece, My Favorite Thing Is Monsters, published by Fantagraphics, now available in two volumes. For those who haven’t had the pleasure, suffice it to say that it’s a story set in the 1960s, as told and drawn by young Karen Reyes, about her coming of age in the Uptown neighborhood of Chicago. Karen identifies and depicts herself as a monster, not (except in one instance) as the innocent and plucky girl that others see. And she tells her story in a notebook, whose binder coil and holes and rules are visible on every page.

“My Favorite Thing Is Monsters” Vol 1 (of 2) by Emil Ferris

Karen’s self-portrait. Karen draws herself not just as a monster but as a stereotype of a monster. Her jaw is spherical and her teeth are perfect cones, while the heads of other major characters like Deeze, Franklin, and especially Anka are malleable and protean — they react and adapt to circumstances. In that one instance where Karen appears as she is seen by others, her face becomes protean too, even as its irregular shape clearly justifies the geometric shape we usually see. The set of her mouth and jaw express hard-won courage in both versions. see.

The mob. At the end of the opening sequence in Book 1, the ugly citizens with pitchforks hunting monsters are called “M.O.B.,” which stands for “Mean, Ordinary, Boring.” What a perfect description of unfree America! Karen says, “What freaks me out is that one day they could turn me into one of them.”

Karen does not fear the mob the way the mob fears her. She writes, “Humans are afraid of death and it makes them frantic. The undead don’t have a ‘self-esteem problem.’” Does the fear of death negatively correlate with self-esteem? Actually, all the major characters in Monsters have a self-esteem problem, but what unites the (sympathetic) ones is that they acknowledge their inner monstrousness instead of pretending it’s not there.

The neighbors. Karen and her mother and older brother Deeze (Diego Zapata Reyes) live in an apartment building with a number of offbeat people. Mrs. Gronan, the gangster’s wife who lives upstairs and has the hots for Deeze, is introduced in Book 1 as an unattractive woman so fabulously decked out that she looks sexy. In Book 2 Karen observes that Mrs. Gronan is pretty as long as she doesn’t try to smile.

Anka’s eyes. Anka, a beautiful holocaust survivor married to a jazz musician, also lives upstairs until, early in Book 1, she is murdered. Eyes—intense, beautiful, and threatening—appear throughout both books, but the eyes of Anka are the saddest.

Hatch lines. The blue and red pen lines used to draw Anka’s skin could almost be her arteries and veins. These complementary colors blend and cancel each other out, so that her face looks like porcelain. In a flashback, she arrives at a Nazi concentration camp, perhaps Theresienstadt, set up to look like a humane facility in order to fool visitors. But the bakery worker is a mannequin with cracks in his “skin,” which remind us of the knife wounds on the face of Karen’s Black classmate Franklin, inflicted by a homophobic gang when he was young.

Franklin’s face. Karen says, “If all the pieces fell away, I got the idea that what was inside him was a big ball of white light.” His scarred face is reminiscent of Frankenstein’s Monster, or the Willem DaFoe character in Poor Things. Franklin illustrates Karen’s idea that Frankenstein was a “skin-tight Prometheus variously coded as Black and queer” (odd language for a 1960s kid, but no matter). Franklin’s scars were inflicted to destroy, unlike the ones on Mary Shelley’s monster that are the marks of an attempt to create life.

Franklin as Françoise in Book 2 hides her scars with makeup, and turns out to be the most soulful Patsy Cline imitator anybody has ever heard.

Commercial art. At one point in Book 2 we see part of an illustration Deeze did for a science fiction novel by his friend Jeffrey Alvarez, a.k.a. The Brain. This sets up several pages concerning Deeze’s second career as a commercial artist (in his day job he’s an enforcer for a loan shark). Deeze may well have created many of the monster comics covers that Karen uses to set off sections of her story. A treat. For comics nerds like me it is enjoyable to learn that Deeze plagiarizes himself. He creates a frightening monster called The Lurch for one of his comics covers and then repurposes it as the repulsive mouth of a different monster, Mothman. This is reminiscent of real life comics legends like Wallace Wood who plagiarized themselves when pressed for time.

Another treat. We see many covers of a horror comic called Ghastly, and they feature a cartoony master of ceremonies in the upper-left-hand corner. This character could have been drawn by Harvey Kurtzman. Similarly, in real life, the emcee character that appeared on covers of the great 1970s-80s Eerie comics series was drawn by Jack Davis, Kurtzman’s frequent collaborator. Image quotation. The re-drawing and re-purposing of art occurs constantly in Monsters, sometimes based on comics imagery but just as often based on the “high art” that Karen encounters at the Art Institute of Chicago, and in Deeze’s art books.

Not every quotation from a famous artwork is acknowledged as such. A parochial school art teacher, remembered fondly by Karen in Book 2, is first seen as a witch on the cover of Dread (another magazine with a comical M.C. in the corner). In Karen’s memory she is a sweet-looking lady, but on the Dread cover she looks just like the grotesque profiles of Jesus’s tormenters in Hieronymus Bosch’s Carrying of the Cross. Grotesques. Ferris’s (i.e., Karen’s) Chicago is full of racists, homophobes, sadists, the ravaged and empty. One group portrait of the surly M.O.B. looks like an homage to George Grosz’s 1920s Berlin etchings. A contradictory image, of everyday Uptown people on the street, has a caption telling us that most of them are migrants and all of them are riders on the “Royal Shaft Express,” as Deeze calls it. These faces are ravaged but not empty.


Slouching towards androgyny. After recreating a painting of Oedipus and the Sphinx in which the Sphinx is a pretty woman, Karen imagines Oedipus saying, “I’m scared of the part of me that is you.” The Sphinx replies, “That part is bigger than you think.” It turns out that women know, and men need to know, that we are all part male and part female. Karen and Deeze illustrate this by mirroring each other.

Hey hey we’re the. Karen says of one of the first girls she crushes on: “Missy’s bedroom used to be monster-themed but now it’s covered in Monkees posters and these big horrible flowers” — Monkees and stylized 1960s flowers being emblems of sexual and sentimental self-presentation, as opposed to monsters that function as emblems of unrestrained nature and difference. As Peter Tork’s brother I defensively object to the idea that the Monkees were fakes, but that’s another story.


Fire. Karen, usually stoical and observant, becomes an aggressive monster flame-thrower when  she learns that Deeze has been hiding their mother’s terminal illness from her. Karen expects to be betrayed by the M.O.B., but not by those she loves.


Paintings. Karen and Deeze bond over their shared (or negotiated) responses to the treasures of the Art Institute of Chicago. The magical romantic projection of themselves into the academic story-paintings is consistent with the theme of adolescent rites of passage.
Ambroise Fredeau’s painting The Blessed Gillaume DeToulouse Tormented by Demons (1657) certainly fits. In Karen’s reading, the painting says that good monsters frighten us because they can’t control how they look, and bad monsters frighten us because they demand control.


The minor character Salvatore is a bad monster observing us from the top floor of a skyscraper, and he is simultaneously German, Italian, and Japanese, i.e., the Axis powers.

The Greens. Anka has a “Viewmistress” covering the bullet hole in her chest. Karen steps through the hole and finds more paintings. As a near-contemporary of Karen, I identify them as the academic paintings we were taught to disparage in the days of triumphant modernism. (The paintings’ dates are 1790, 1865, 1875, 1886, and 1906, bringing us right up to the surrealist revolt.)

This sequence culminates in a two-page spread, “Green Island,” a fever dream of solace where a branch overhanging a rapids turns into a skeleton’s hand groping a breast or buttock. For me, Green Island evokes the “Green Door” of H.G. Wells and Jim Lowe (Wells wrote a story in 1906 of an elusive green door leading to happiness, and Lowe had a hit record in 1956 where he couldn’t get through the Green Door leading to a rocking party.)


A Cool Breeze. The sky in Alpine Scene by Gustave Doré, as depicted by Karen, is full of fuzzy stars “like the tangled strands of pearls in Mama’s jumbled jewelry box.” The actual painting is set in daytime and is only dark because of the towering evergreens in what looks like the Black Forest. The original, like Karen’s version, has a tiny male figure as its focal point, but it also has a second figure, perhaps a sweetheart, that Karen leaves out. The famously gloomy artist Doré sees companionship and a cool breeze in the shade, where Karen sees solitude and mortal dread.


Victor. At the end of Book 1, Karen turns and sees Deeze but it’s not Deeze, it’s Victor, the twin brother that Deeze killed (by accident?) when they were children. Victor, who will become an important character in Book 2, seems to float among the fuzzy stars and the eyes of Anka, not to
mention the holes in the notebook pages. Sexuality of the monster trope. In the Dracula story, woman’s irrationality/hysteria is the flaw that lets evil insinuate itself into polite society. In Monsters, society is never polite and Karen’s awakening gayness is the armor that makes society bearable, at the same time that it is her authentic self.


Chicago. I love all the drawings of Chicago and wish there were more. In one full-page drawing of Karen and Deeze on the bridge over the Chicago River, near the end of Book 2, the golden evening light from the West butts up against the pale blue light coming off of Lake Michigan to the East. Not naturalistic but it certainly puts you there. But no act of virtuosity exists for its own sake in Monsters, except in the sense that Karen might like to show off her drawing chops sometimes. That poignant picture of the Chicago River at twilight feels like it’s there to foreshadow the imminent ending of Deeze and Karen’s rich Chicago life.


The invisible man. In Book 2 the lost or missing father of Karen and Deeze materializes as a vicious tramp and a surrogate for the biblical Holofernes, the supposedly invincible warrior beheaded by Judith so that her community could survive. Many different paintings of Judith killing Holofernes are reproduced, mirroring Karen’s obsession with, and ambivalence about, violence and female power.


Later. The notebook/journal format of Monsters allows major story points to be implied or passed over, not stated or concluded plainly. It’s as if Karen says to herself, “I will never know what happened when I took Deeze’s gun and went looking for my father, but never mind, let me move on to the stuff I’m actually trying to understand.”


In Book 2 we frequently hear some form of “I’ll tell you more about this later,” which doesn’t happen.

Another example. The episode in Book 2 featuring “the preacher guy” and his female followers seems too brief after such a tantalizing setup, but I appreciate the idea that these sinister characters are going to do what they do, for better or for worse, and we don’t need to know what that is. Unanswered questions feel more true to life than the typical wrapping-it-up ending to a murder mystery.


Except for this. In Book 2 we learn that Deeze is a killer, and we already know Anka is a murder victim. Also in Book 2, Deeze denies that he killed Anka. Well, actually, he denies that he meant to kill her. But even after two fat comic books, we don’t know how or why she was shot, do we?
We do hear, or seem to hear, a jealous Deeze say to Anka, “I’ve always been a big distraction for you, haven’t I? And then you throw me a look and I come running. I should put a goddam bullet through your heart!”


On the other hand. We learn late in Book 2 that the police wanted to frame Chubb, the ventriloquist in the building, for Anka’s murder. This doesn’t make sense if Deeze was the killer, does it? The cops all have it in for Deeze because Deeze’s father, Frank, was once a cop and he wants his former fellow police to make Deeze suffer for the death of Victor.

And on the other other hand, just because somebody wants to frame you doesn’t mean you’re innocent. Could it have been the lovesick ventriloquist, impersonating Deeze, that threatened to shoot Anka, and did so? I suppose we’ll never know.

The sixties. The main thing we know from Book 2 is that Karen and Deeze leave Chicago, which seems all but impossible except they’re being hunted by the police and, anyway, leaving home is what young people did in the 1960s.


From one angle, Monsters is a perfect sixties story, “the sixties without apology.” We monsters of that era needn’t apologize for being freaks, for rebelling, for facing sexuality head-on. Ferris doesn’t say this but it occurs to me that we have spent all the decades since then wondering whether we may have been turned “into one of them.”

3 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Advocate by Eddie Ahn comics review

Advocate. Eddie Ahn. Ten Speed Graphic. 2024. 208pp. $24.99

Eddie Ahn learned early on that the only way to really make a difference demands hard work and dedication fueled by passion. You see that zeal on every page of his debut graphic memoir. Taken as a whole, the book runs at a steady clip which evokes the life of a bright and sensitive young man determined to help his family and community. What’s remarkable is that Eddie Ahn managed to put in the time and energy to become both a successful environmental lawyer in San Francisco and a brilliant cartoonist. This is the story of the titular advocate and storyteller.

With great humor and insight, Ahn seamlessly takes the reader along for a ride that covers his journey of self-discovery. Comics, especially nonfiction comics, tends to be a balancing act of editing and boiling down to the prime facts while not losing any of the flavor. So, you have here a wonderful back and forth narrative wave dipping down to a granular level then back up to a big picture view and so on. Ahn is not afraid to shift the timeline as needed and do some nonlinear fancy footwork. There’s one segment where the story is comparing events a decade apart: a medical trauma that Ahn experienced in 2008 compared to a medical trauma experience by his mother in 2017 and it works beautifully. A lot of this story deals with family and how one person’s journey is influenced by decisions made going back generations. In that sense, seeing one’s destiny as the culmination of countless decisions, illuminates Ahn’s circuitous path that led him to his relatively unlikely but quite successful career in fighting for environmental social justice.

Coming from a mixed race background as I do, my father Anglo and my mother Mexican, I can certainly relate to Ahn’s point of view as he sees life through the prism of a Korean American. That strangers-in-a-strange-land saga, that is the legacy of the immigrant experience, is evoked so well by Ahn as he shares his parents’ vision, ambition and struggles, always striving for and measuring success. When have you reached your goal? Once you have achieved the American dream of buying a house? Once you have amassed enough wealth that you can easily purchase a new luxury car as a thank you gift to your parents? Ahn dissects all these efforts, misgivings, and calculations along that ladder climb to success. This book, both inspiring and highly entertaining, is his final report card to his beloved parents. Advocate is not what I expected at first. It’s a refreshing and riveting read, just the sort of unexpected read that will make you want to make your own difference in the world.

Advocate is available as of April 16, 2024, published by Ten Speed Graphic, an imprint of Penguin Random House.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

The Werewolf at Dusk by David Small book review

The Werewolf at Dusk and Other Stories. David Small. Liveright. New York. 2024. 175pp. $25

One great way to approach David Small’s delightful new “graphic novel” is as a collection of bedtime fairy tales for discerning adults. And, no, I am not inferring that this is a book to keep away from the youngest readers. There is nothing explicit to be found here. What I mean is that this is a delicious book for world-weary folks who want to be entranced by a dance made up of words and pictures. There’s nothing pretentious to be found here either. Just a very smart, whimsical foray, beginning with the titular tale involving a werewolf who has somehow outlived its purpose, just too long in the tooth.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

Souls of Black Folk: A Graphic Interpretation by Paul Peart-Smith book review

Souls of Black Folk: A Graphic Interpretation

Souls of Black Folk: A Graphic Interpretation. Art & Adaptation by Paul Peart-Smith. Edited by Paul Buhle & Herb Boyd. Rutgers University Press. 2023. 180pp. $22.95

Artist Paul Peart-Smith presents the first graphic novel adaptation of a landmark work, a hybrid of cultural studies and personal essay, W.E.B. Du Bois’s 1903 book, The Souls of Black Folk. The original work is filled with insight into the Black person’s experience after the American Civil War as well as functioning as a prevailing call to action. Peart-Smith masterfully works with Du Bois’s timeless prose: navigating the “vast veil,” observing with a “second-sight,” and absorbing it all with a “double-consciousness.”

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

GATSBY FEVER: The Great Gatsby in Comics

The novel that set the gold standard.

The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, is a big deal and for very good reason. First and foremost, it is a great read.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews

The Girl Who Electrified Tesla by Cynthia Von Buhler comics review

Minky Woodcock: The Girl Who Electrified Tesla, Issue 2. Written and illustrated by Cynthia von Buhler, 2021 (Hard Case Crime/Titan Comics) 110pp. $24.99. (Above cover art by Robert McGinnis)

I spotted this ravishing pulpy cover and I immediately made a mental note, “Tesla girl!” I was just doing my usual navigating and took a second look at Cynthia Von Buhler’s Instagram account. The idea of a really quirky take on Nikola Tesla via comics appealed to me. Over the years, Tesla has become a genre all to itself open to new and fun interpretations. This title does not disappoint and led me down an array of intriguing paths.

Cynthia von Buhler is a genuine art geek, to put it bluntly. This comic truly lives up to its promise by thoughtfully doing all the necessary prep work in order to deliver something authentic. I felt that Tesla was really alive on the page, skulking around Bryant Park and whispering sweet nothings to his pigeon wife. Indeed, the mad scientist never married and did develop a curious attachment to pigeons. That peculiarity and many more are faithfully depicted by von Buhler. This respect for the subject matter compliments the crime thriller that ensues.

Feeding the pigeons in Bryant Park.

What von Buhler manages to do is juggle a number of tantalizing facts. It is New York City, circa 1943: Nazis are creeping in the shadows in pursuit of Tesla’s mysterious Death Ray; Josephine Baker, the beautiful bisexual jazz singer and dancer is performing and spying; John Trump (uncle to Donald) is a doctor with plans of his own to take Tesla’s secret weapon. Add to the mix our protagonist, the diehard detective Minky Woodcock determined to crack the biggest case of her career involving the fate of the planet and, for good measure, a chance to bed none other than Josephine Baker.

Agatha steps in!

The artwork throughout is a delightful homage to gritty pulp fiction, with a steamy semi-realistic quality and a larger-than-life pop culture vibe. There’s both a static and dynamic quality at play, like woodcuts or dolls that have come to life, very eerie and fascinating. Many of the scenes, in fact, would make for beautiful stand-alone paintings. Ultimately, the art naturally fits the book, keeping pace with the narrative. I think of it as moving at a gumshoe detective novel pace: at times melancholy; at other turns, dramatic and intense. Which leads me to mention that, after reading this one, you are going to want more. In fact, there is plenty more to choose from, both in graphic novel format and prose since von Buhler’s book is part of something bigger, the world of Hard Case Crime, featuring work by such modern masters as Stephen King and golden age giants as Ray Bradbury. And, with that in mind, do seek out this gem of a graphic novel by Cynthia von Buhler.

3 Comments

Filed under Comics, Graphic Novel Reviews, Nikola Tesla

MONICA by Daniel Clowes graphic novel review

Monica. By Daniel Clowes. Seattle: Fantagraphics, 2023. 106pp, $30.

Guest review by Paul Buhle

This has been quite a year for determinedly offbeat comic artist Dan Clowes. An interview in the New Yorker followed by a strong review beginning on the front page of the New York Times Book Review, not to mention an NPR interview, nailed down the point: Clowes has hit the big time.

Is this as far as “alt-comics,” somewhere beyond the comic strip and the comic book, can go in becoming “mainstream”? It’s a good question, first raised properly by the reception of the comic art of R. Crumb, then of Art Spiegelman (whose looming presence remains above the scenery somehow), of Alison Bechdel, Joe Sacco and others. The work of Ben Katchor, who is now designing comic-like images for Paris Metro lines stretching into the villages of the countryside, might remind us that in France, comics can be art. Back in the US and despite the rising prestige (and commercial success) of some artists, their work remains….comic art! If, admittedly, viewed very differently from the comic art of old: fewer readers but more prestige, as cynics would say.

Clowes, part of the alternative comics that followed the collapse of the 1960s-70s underground comix, saw Ghost World, his creation, become the basis for a film about teenage angst, with himself as one of the scriptwriters. It was a first for comic scriptwriters, even if comic characters themselves had appeared in dozens of older Hollywood films, with several series of low-production films dedicated to the sagas of Blondie, Joe Palooka and even Captain Marvel (a kids’ serial).

These three series actually happened to have been scripted by Lefties who would go on the blacklist (except for the Captain Marvel series, whose writer became an affable Friendly Witness testifying against his former comrades), and lose their careers. The films themselves, now totally obscure,  even have a curious, populistic social content, leaving one to wonder. What gives? Never mind. These ancient memories of comics adaptations are also buried beneath the tons of animated films from comics, seen especially at holiday times on television or via DVDs.

We are reminded, in an astute Comics Quarterly essay on Monica, that real-life artist Clowes was abandoned by his mother, and that “loneliness” is a continuing theme with a continuing expression in his aesthetics and a basis in personal life. Monica, the fictional subject of the comic is, to put it mildly, a troubled person. But Clowes is not telling anything so straightforward as autobiography. We experience the novel through her wavering consciousness, sometimes beyond her consciousness, which may be the most helpful of all hints.

“Foxhole,” the first of eight semi-discrete and separate chapters or episodes, goes back to the Vietnam War. A disillusioned GI from a poor background reflects on his disillusionment to his battlefield/jungle setting mate, who is from America’s wealthy classes, while they wait to kill or be killed. The trauma in these three pages is not going away. Indeed, the sense of apocalypse described is revisited, precisely, on the final panel of the book.

Other reviewers seem to run away from this particular as anything like central to the plot, and it makes sense. What we see through most of Monica is the results of the 1960s social breakdowns, the impossibility of a thriving counterculture measured in the broken homes and broken lives, crazed cults and children confused or, rather, disoriented for life. Cynical commentators have always viewed this human tragedy as a loss of traditional morals, socially enforced wage slavery, the dangers of drugs, etc. Clowes knows better, although he will not say so.

Our embittered GI returning, he thinks, to a quiet and happy life, is not. He’s the  fiancee  of our protagonist’s mother, but never her husband. His foxhole mate, a serious painter who has returned to the US first, turns out to be the actual biological father, or perhaps not. Monica’s mother Penny,  a counterculture burnout, stumbles along through life, although she actually launches a business that, much later, her daughter can revive and expand successfully, something that brings no pleasure. The book’s sometime narrator, a friend to Penny, relates and reflects on  a not-so-unusual confused single mom experience.  And Monica emerges,  episode after episode, not only damaged but keenly aware of being damaged. She a modern person, a modern woman, who does not accept fatalism, although to do so might have been a better strategy.

In the following vignette, the seemingly more fortunate one of the two GIs returns to his hometown, years later, and quickly realizes that crucial matters including his extended family and their small capitalist empire, have totally fallen apart. In this odd little world, Monica-the-comic becomes a perfectly recreated EC-comic horror story from the early 1950s, updated and upgraded artistically. And then the drugstore supernaturalism ends or perhaps drifts around, looking for a spot to land.

Monica the protagonist reemerges, alone in the world. Reviewers have found something special and intriguing, or at least narratively clear, in her listening to a radio left behind in a family cabin. The radio broadcasts, unbelievably but believably to her, feature the voice of her dead grandfather and allow her to have unsatisfied conversations with him. Although years dead, he is still an anti-Semite.

A few more vignettes and more than twenty years pass. Monica becomes a successful entrepreneur, but success only exposes the emptiness of her life. Her last-gasp effort finds her in a remote cult that manages to somehow be utterly boring, one more sixties offshoot full of conspiracy theories and compulsory collectivity. Successfully tracking down her mother is a total downer, as we might have expected.

That we find ourselves back in EC horror comics at the end is either the fulfillment of the prologue, one Vietnam vet to another predicting utter horror, or it is a general commentary about the average American life in the twenty first century. The consumer society drags on. Dreams of something different are apparently worse than confused. And we face the cosmos, on the cover of the book, searching for a meaning that is not there (on the back cover, more EC, but leaning toward the famed sci-fi series that borrowed heavily from Ray Bradbury.

The Vietnam War explanation to the book’s mysteries, to the mysteries in Daniel Clowes’s mind. Extraordinary crimes were done in our collective name, and someone must be punished. Then again, as mentioned elsewhere, the aesthetics, such as the darker tinting of pages treating trauma,  may work just as well.

Paul Buhle is an editor of more than twenty non-fiction, historical comics.

2 Comments

Filed under Comics, Daniel Clowes, Graphic Novel Reviews